Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 3;11:728740. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.728740

Table 3.

Deterministic sensitivity analyses..

Scenario ICER (US$/QALY)
RCT RWD
Base-case 33,077 25,107
Clinical outcomes
 Survival*
  RFS [Best case; Weibull (RCT), Weibull (RWD)] 31,260 22,948
  RFS [Worst case; Log-normal (RCT), Generalized gamma (RWD)] 33,077 31,695
  OS [Best case; Weibull (RCT), Generalized gamma (RWD)) 31,009 22,587
  OS [Worst case; Generalized gamma (RCT), Log-normal (RWD)] 38,831 27,545
 Proportion of curable recurrence
  Considering a portion of TACE as a curative treatment (CIK 75.8% vs No Tx 72.6%) 36,293 29,237
 Health-related quality of life
 Health state utilities
  Cancer free and incurable recurrence state (Upper bound) 31,876 24,978
  Cancer free and incurable recurrence state (Lower bound) 33,971 25,236
Costs
 Medical costs from other healthcare systems
  The USA [derived from Cardier et al., (23)] 38,425 9,505
  France [derived from Cardier et al., (23)] 34,617 25,626
  Italy [derived from Rognoni et al., (24)] 34,141 22,197
 End-of-life cost
  Upper bound (+20%) 32,930 24,695
  Lower bound (–20%) 33,223 25,187
Analytic perspective (Societal perspective)
  Including productivity loss cost 25,562 19,858
Model parameters
  Time horizon (15 years) 41,628 32,730
  Time horizon (25 years) 28,799 21,263
  Annual discount rate (3%) 27,617 20,336
  Annual discount rate (7.5%) 40,926 31,973

ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RWD, real-world data; RFS, recurrence-free survival; OS, overall survival; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.

*To see the uncertainty from the selected survival curve, we carried out a sensitivity analysis that calculated the lowest (best case) and the highest (worst case) ICER by applying each parametric survival distribution to OS and RFS.