Table 4.

TM-score, RMSD value, GMQE score, QMEAN Z-score, ERRAT value, and PROCHECK Ramachandran plot analysis of the selected protein models.

Protein	Model	TM-align		SWISS-MODEL		ERRAT	PROCHECK Ramachandran plot analysis
		TM-scorea	RMSD	GMQE score	QMEAN Z-scoreb	ERRAT value (overall quality factor)c	Residues in most favoured regionsd	Residues in additional allowed regionsd	Residues in generously allowed regionsd	Residues in disallowed regionsd
MYB	+	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	97.222	120 (87.6%)	17 (12.4%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
	G111S	1	0	0.15	0.55	99.3056	122 (88.4%)	15 (10.9%)	0 (0.0%)	1 (0.7%)
	N183S	1	0	0.16	0.72	98.6111	122 (89.1%)	15 (10.9%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
MYBL1	+	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	97.9167	123 (89.1%)	15 (10.9%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
	G122S	1	0	0.15	− 0.02	98.6014	123 (89.1%)	15 (10.9%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
MYBL2	+	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	96.5278	119 (86.2%)	19 (13.8%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)
	S178C	1	0	0.16	0.19	96.5278	118 (85.5%)	20 (14.5%)	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)

TM-score template modelling-score, RMSD root-mean-square deviation, GMQE global model quality estimation, QMEAN qualitative model energy analysis, “+” Wildtype.

^aRandom structural similarity (0.0 < TM-score < 0.30), both structures are within the same fold (0.50 < TM-score < 1.00).

^bLow quality model (QMEAN Z-score ≤ − 4.0).

^cReliable model (ERRAT value > 85%).

^dNumber of residues (percentage of residues).