Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet A. 2020 Nov 18;185(9):2690–2718. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61972

TABLE 5.

Sex and zygosity for discordant twins in this series and literature series

Sex
Zygosity
N M F UNK DZ MZ UZ
This series
 MCD 34 18 16 0 8 17 9
 CBLH-DWM 12 8 4 0 6 4 2
 BRD 10 5 5 0 5 1 4

Total 56 31 25 0 19 22 15

Literature series
 MCD 14 7 7 0 0 14 0
 CBLH-DWM 16 3 6 7 0 14 2
 BRD 18 14 4 0 1 17 0

Total 48 24 17 7 1 45 2

Note: N = 56 subjects with seven affected co-twins excluded. References for literature twin cohort provided in Supplementary Tables S2S4. For 7/56 proband twins, the co-twin was concordant for a brain malformation or disruption, but discordant for severity; the more severely affected co-twin was always selected as the proband twin.

Abbreviations: BRD, brain disruptions including hydranencephaly–porencephaly; CBLH, cerebellar hypoplasia; DWM, Dandy–Walker malformation; DZ, dizygotic twins; MCD, malformation of cortical development; MZ, monozygotic twins; UNK, unknown sex; UZ, unknown zygosity.