Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 10;61:58–65. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.12.004

Table 3.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of AP-MRI screening.

Screening strategies BC deaths Screen-detected cancers Radiation-induced tumour Interval cancers Discounted LYGa Discounted ACERa (k€/LYG) ICER (k€/LYG)
MAM 50-74 736 (3) 573 (2) 18 (0.4) 671 (2)
Base scenarios
Biennial screening
Strategy A 719 (3) 635 (2) 15 (0.4) 609 (3) 132 (2) 16.0 (0.2) 18.2
Strategy B 715 (3) 657 (2) 14 (0.4) 589 (2) 145 (1) 17.8 (0.2) ED
Strategy C 713 (3) 674 (2) 13 (0.4) 585 (3) 149 (1) 18.8 (0.1) ED
Strategy D 671 (2) 805 (2) 4 (0.2) 441 (2) 501 (5) 21.7 (0.2) 24.7
Strategy E 655 (2) 891 (2) 2 (0.1) 362 (1) 554 (4) 23.9 (0.2) ED
Strategy F 649 (2) 952 (2) NA 347 (2) 562 (5) 25.7 (0.2) 58.7
Alternative scenarios
Triennial screening
Strategy A-3 724 (3) 614 (2) 15 (0.4) 630 (2) 91 (1) 15.1 (0.2) 15.5
Strategy B-3 723 (3) 620 (2) 14 (0.4) 625 (2) 95 (1) 15.5 (0.2) ED
Strategy C-3 721 (3) 634 (1) 14 (0.4) 622 (2) 98 (1) 17.0 (0.3) ED
Strategy D-3 694 (2) 697 (1) 3 (0.2) 507 (2) 334 (7) 20.3 (0.4) 23.0
Strategy E-3 690 (2) 740 (2) 2 (0.1) 506 (2) 353 (4) 21.4 (0.3) ED
Strategy F-3 684 (2) 790 (2) NA 500 (2) 362 (5) 23.6 (0.3) ED
Quadrennial screening
Strategy A-4 731 (3) 586 (2) 15 (0.4) 657 (3) 52 (1) 14.7 (0.2) 14.7
Strategy B-4 729 (3) 596 (2) 14 (0.4) 649 (2) 59 (1) 17.3 (0.3) ED
Strategy C-4 728 (3) 602 (2) 14 (0.4) 652 (3) 60 (1) 18.2 (0.3) ED
Strategy D-4 727 (2) 567 (2) 3 (0.2) 672 (2) 158 (5) 23.4 (0.7) ED
Strategy E-4 713 (2) 640 (2) 2 (0.1) 605 (2) 204 (5) 25.9 (0.6) ED
Strategy F-4 711 (2) 660 (2) NA 622 (2) 205 (5) 27.5 (0.7) ED

Abbreviations: BC = Breast cancer; LYG = Life year gained; ACER = Average cost-effectiveness ratio; ICER = Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; ED = Extended dominance.

a

A discounting rate of 3% was applied for both costs and LYG. All data expressed as mean (SEs) per 10,000 women screened.