Table 4.
Summary of the final step of the hierarchical regression analysis for the relationship between BMI and flanker performance after controlling for the variance associated with descriptive variables following rest and exercise interventions.
B | SE B | Beta | t | P | Δ R2 | VIF | |
Performance After Rest | |||||||
|
|||||||
Accuracy | |||||||
Congruent | −0.17 | 0.17 | −0.11 | −0.98 | 0.33 | 0.008 | 1.37 |
Incongruent | −0.35 | 0.24 | −0.16 | −1.50 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 1.32 |
Interference | −0.01 | 0.17 | −0.008 | −0.07 | −0.34 | 0.000 | 1.39 |
MeanRT | |||||||
Congruent | 0.29 | 2.35 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.90 | 0.000 | 1.32 |
Incongruent | −0.42 | 2.39 | −0.02 | −0.18 | 0.86 | 0.000 | 1.32 |
Interference | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.11 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 0.009 | 1.39 |
Performance After Exercise | |||||||
|
|||||||
Accuracy | |||||||
Congruent | −0.36 | 0.12 | −0.31 | −3.04 | 0.003* | 0.07 | 1.39 |
Incongruent | −0.52 | 0.16 | −0.32 | −3.26 | 0.001** | 0.07 | 1.26 |
Interference | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 1.44 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 1.26 |
MeanRT | |||||||
Congruent | −2.84 | 2.14 | −0.14 | −1.33 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 1.32 |
Incongruent | −3.54 | 2.26 | −0.17 | −1.57 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 1.39 |
Interference | −0.51 | 0.76 | −0.07 | −0.67 | 0.50 | 0.004 | 1.39 |
Model is significant at the 0.01 level.
Model is significant at the 0.05 level.