Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Neurosci Educ. 2020 Oct 22;21:100143. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2020.100143

Table 4.

Summary of the final step of the hierarchical regression analysis for the relationship between BMI and flanker performance after controlling for the variance associated with descriptive variables following rest and exercise interventions.

B SE B Beta t P Δ R2 VIF
Performance After Rest

Accuracy
 Congruent −0.17 0.17 −0.11 −0.98 0.33 0.008 1.37
 Incongruent −0.35 0.24 −0.16 −1.50 0.14 0.02 1.32
 Interference −0.01 0.17 −0.008 −0.07 −0.34 0.000 1.39
MeanRT
 Congruent 0.29 2.35 0.01 0.12 0.90 0.000 1.32
 Incongruent −0.42 2.39 −0.02 −0.18 0.86 0.000 1.32
 Interference 0.83 0.81 0.11 1.03 0.30 0.009 1.39
Performance After Exercise

Accuracy
 Congruent −0.36 0.12 −0.31 −3.04 0.003* 0.07 1.39
 Incongruent −0.52 0.16 −0.32 −3.26 0.001** 0.07 1.26
 Interference 0.16 0.11 0.15 1.44 0.15 0.02 1.26
MeanRT
 Congruent −2.84 2.14 −0.14 −1.33 0.19 0.01 1.32
 Incongruent −3.54 2.26 −0.17 −1.57 0.12 0.02 1.39
 Interference −0.51 0.76 −0.07 −0.67 0.50 0.004 1.39
**

Model is significant at the 0.01 level.

*

Model is significant at the 0.05 level.