Table 2.
Adjusted models examining the impact of warning exposure (n = 776).
| B (SE) | p | |
|---|---|---|
|
Negative affect Spanish Dual |
−0.06 (0.65) 1.80 (0.66) |
0.921 0.007 |
|
Perceived message effectiveness Spanish Dual |
0.33 (0.40) 0.84 (0.40) |
0.402 0.007 |
|
Psychological reactance Spanish Dual |
0.56 (0.40) 1.55 (0.41) |
0.165 <0.001 |
|
Clarity Spanish Dual |
0.84 (0.38) 0.61 (0.39) |
0.028 0.115 |
|
Advertisement appeal Spanish Dual |
0.55 (0.26) 0.46 (0.27) |
0.037 0.091 |
|
Product appeal Spanish Dual |
0.40 (0.24) 0.38 (0.24) |
0.098 0.118 |
|
Likelihood of purchase Spanish Dual |
0.57 (0.26) 0.25 (0.26) |
0.030 0.342 |
|
Attention Spanish Dual |
0.12 (0.15) 0.14 (0.16) |
0.432 0.384 |
|
Cognitive Spanish Dual |
0.17 (0.15) 0.07 (0.15) |
0.256 0.639 |
|
Likelihood of sharing with friends Spanish Dual |
0.23 (0.16) 0.28 (0.16) |
0.149 0.089 |
|
Perceived knowledge gained Spanish Dual |
0.06 (0.16) 0.35 (0.16) |
0.701 0.030 |
|
Intentions to use e-cigarettes Spanish Dual |
−0.06 (0.14) −0.13 (0.14) |
0.693 0.368 |
| Notes: Models adjust for language preference and proficiency, sex, race and ethnicity, education, income, sexual orientation, days used e-cigarettes, and data source. Beta signifies the impact of Spanish and Dual warnings on the outcome, with the English warning as the referent group. Bold indicates p < 0.01. | ||