Table 3.
Adjusted Models Examining the Impact of Warning Exposure – Spanish-dominant subgroup (n = 291)
| B (SE) | p | |
|---|---|---|
|
Negative affect Spanish Dual |
−0.49 (0.91) 1.68 (1.0) |
0.588 0.094 |
|
Perceived message effectiveness Spanish Dual |
−0.02 (0.55) 0.73 (0.60) |
0.965 0.226 |
|
Psychological reactance Spanish Dual |
0.79 (51) 2.17 (0.56) |
0.120 <0.001 |
|
Clarity Spanish Dual |
1.20 (0.56) 1.14 (0.61) |
0.036 0.064 |
|
Advertisement appeal Spanish Dual |
1.03 (0.36) 0.69 (0.40) |
0.005 0.085 |
|
Product appeal Spanish Dual |
0.62 (0.34) 0.35 (0.36) |
0.068 0.333 |
|
Likelihood of purchase Spanish Dual |
0.84 (0.35) 0.14 (0.38) |
0.018 0.714 |
|
Attention Spanish Dual |
0.07 (0.22) 0.30 (0.24) |
0.750 0.210 |
|
Cognitive Spanish Dual |
0.29 (0.20) 0.34 (0.22) |
0.158 0.127 |
|
Likelihood of sharing Spanish Dual |
0.24 (0.21) 0.09 (0.23) |
0.252 0.692 |
|
Perceived knowledge gained Spanish Dual |
0.18 (0.23) 0.44 (0.25) |
0.412 0.076 |
|
Intentions to use e-cigarettes Spanish Dual |
0.08 (0.20) 0.19 (0.22) |
0.693 0.384 |
| Notes: Models adjust for language preference and proficiency, sex, race and ethnicity, education, income, sexual orientation, days used e-cigarettes, and data source. Beta signifies the impact of Spanish and Dual warnings on the outcome, with the English warning as the referent group. Bold indicates p < 0.01. | ||