Table 2.
Previous Literature Investigating the Detection of KCN From Corneal Topographic Images
Study | KCN Classes | Device Used | Dataset/Number of Maps | Evaluation Method | Network Used | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kamiya et al.19 | Normal and 4 grades of KCN | Tomey CASIA | 543 cases/6 maps | Fivefold CV | ResNet-18 | 99% |
Kuo et al.20 | Normal, KCN | Tomey TMS-4 Corneal Topographer | 354 cases/1 map | Training, testing, and subclinical testing | VGG16 InceptionV3 ResNet152 | 93.1% 93.1%95.8% |
Lavric and Valentin21 | Normal, KCN | Synthetic maps | SyntEyes and SyntEyes KTC models58/1 map | Training, validation, and testing | KeratoDetect | 99.3% |
Zeboulon et al.22 | Normal/KCN and history of refractive surgery | Bausch + Lomb Orbscan | 3000 cases/4 maps | Tenfold CV | CNN | 99.3% |
Al-Timemy et al.23 | Normal, KCN | OCULUS Pentacam | 534 cases/4 maps | Training, validation, and testing | EDTL with AlexNet and product fusion | 98.3% |
Current study | Normal, KCN, suspected KCN | OCULUS Pentacam | 692 eyes/7 maps | Training, validation, and independent testing | EfficientNet-b0 DL with SVM | Two-class, 98% Three-class, 81.6% |
CV, cross-validation; EDTL, ensemble deep transfer learning.