Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 11;107(1):88–97. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab641

Table 3.

Associations of metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with incident cardiovascular disease

Population No. of participants No. of cases Incidence rateb (95% CI) Model 1c HR (95% CI) P Model 2d HR (95% CI) P
Non-FL 3417 134 8.7 (7.4-10.3) Reference Reference
MAFLD 2950 162 12.3 (10.6-14.4) 1.43 (1.14-1.80) .002 1.44 (1.15-1.81) .002
With metabolic dysfunctiona only 2522 142 12.6 (10.7-14.9) 1.48 (1.16-1.87) .001 1.48 (1.17-1.89) .001
With excessive alcohol consumption 298 12 9.0 (5.1-15.8) 0.99 (0.54-1.80) .961 1.01 (0.55-1.85) .975
With HBV infection 141 8 12.8 (6.4-25.7) 1.47 (0.72-3.01) .287 1.48 (0.73-3.03) .279
Non-FL 3417 134 8.7 (7.4-10.3) Reference Reference
NAFLD 2545 143 12.6 (10.7-14.9) 1.47 (1.16-1.87) .001 1.48 (1.17-1.88) .001

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B virus; HR, hazard ratio; MAFLD, metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; non-FL, non–fatty liver.

a Metabolic dysfunction was defined as the presence of at least 1 of the 3 criteria: overweight/obesity, diabetes, or metabolic dysregulation.

b Incidence rate was calculated as the number of incident cases divided by per 1000 person-years of follow-up.

c Model 1 was adjusted for sex and age.

d Model 2 was adjusted for sex, age, educational background, smoking status, and leisure-time exercise at baseline.