Table 5.

Estimated Proportions of Acquiescers by Respondent Characteristics under Different Classification Methods

A. Overall Sample
Respondent Characteristics	n	Acquiescer Classification Method 1
		Prop_All	Illogic_Balanced	Illogic_Pair	Prop_Pair	Score_Hetero	CFA_Balanced	LCA_Balanced	MNRM
Age
≤35 years old	106	31.10%	22.60%	77.40%	36.80%	32.10%	33.00%	34.90%	33.96%
36–50 years old	84	44.00%	23.80%	78.60%	50.00%	46.40%	31.00%	32.10%	44.05%
51–64 years old	119	56.30%	37.00%	85.70%	55.50%	52.10%	39.50%	41.20%	61.34%
≥65 years old	91	69.20%	50.50%	87.90%	70.30%	69.20%	56.00%	57.10%	59.34%
χ2 test2		p<0.001	p<0.001	p=0.136	p<0.001	p<0.001	p=0.002	p=0.003	p<0.001
Gender
Male	122	41.00%	30.30%	82.80%	43.40%	44.30%	35.20%	41.00%	45.08%
Female	278	54.00%	34.90%	82.40%	56.80%	51.80%	41.70%	41.40%	52.16%
χ2 test		p=0.023	p=0.438	p=1.000	p=0.018	p=0.201	p=0.268	p=1.000	p=0.193
Education
<High school	101	80.20%	55.40%	97.00%	82.20%	75.20%	58.40%	57.40%	66.34%
High school/GED	91	56.00%	35.20%	92.30%	60.40%	51.60%	39.60%	44.00%	56.04%
≥Some college	198	31.80%	21.20%	70.20%	34.80%	35.40%	30.30%	31.80%	38.38%
χ2 test		p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001
Ethnicity/Language
Non-Latino White	99	20.20%	16.20%	65.70%	22.20%	32.30%	23.20%	19.20%	30.30%
Latinos interviewed in English	100	37.00%	25.00%	79.00%	36.00%	34.00%	31.00%	35.00%	39.00%
Latino interviewed in Spanish	201	71.10%	46.30%	92.50%	76.10%	65.70%	52.20%	55.20%	65.17%
χ2 test		p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001
B. Latino Respondents Only
Respondent Characteristics	n	Acquiescer Classification Metdod1
		Prop_All	Illogic_Balanced	Illogic_Pair	Prop_Pair	Score_Hetero	CFA_Balanced	LCA_Balanced	MNRM
Age
≤35 years old	80	40.00%	26.30%	81.30%	45.00%	37.50%	33.80%	40.00%	42.50%
36–50 years old	61	60.70%	31.10%	88.50%	62.30%	55.70%	39.30%	42.60%	54.10%
51–64 years old	88	62.50%	42.00%	89.80%	64.80%	56.80%	45.50%	45.50%	64.77%
≥65 years old	72	77.80%	56.90%	93.10%	80.60%	72.20%	62.50%	66.70%	63.89%
χ2 test		p<0.001	p<0.001	p=0.139	p<0.001	p<0.001	p=0.003	p=0.005	p=0.014
Gender
Male	90	51.10%	35.60%	88.90%	54.40%	53.30%	41.10%	47.80%	50.00%
Female	211	63.50%	40.80%	87.70%	66.40%	55.90%	46.90%	48.80%	59.24%
χ2 test		p=0.060	p=0.473	p=0.918	p=0.068	p=0.774	p=0.423	p=0.969	p=0.139
Education
<High school	96	82.30%	56.30%	96.90%	84.40%	75.00%	59.40%	58.30%	68.75%
High school/GED	75	60.00%	38.70%	94.70%	68.00%	54.70%	42.70%	50.70%	56.00%
≥Some college	125	42.40%	25.60%	76.80%	44.80%	40.00%	35.20%	39.20%	46.40%
χ2 test		p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p<0.001	p=0.001	p=0.017	p=0.004
Latino Subgroup
Mexican	100	58.00%	35.00%	89.00%	57.00%	56.00%	41.00%	44.00%	47.00%
Cuban	100	60.00%	39.00%	86.00%	68.00%	62.00%	49.00%	51.00%	61.00%
Puerto Rican	101	61.40%	43.60%	89.10%	63.40%	47.50%	45.50%	50.50%	61.39%
χ2 test		p=0.886	p=0.461	p=0.744	p=0.271	p=0.116	p=0.522	p=0.543	p=0.065
Acculturation
More NLW	50	24.00%	18.00%	76.00%	26.00%	30.00%	30.00%	36.00%	32.00%
More Latino	181	70.20%	47.00%	92.80%	74.60%	62.40%	53.60%	56.40%	64.64%
Hi Bicultural	43	65.10%	30.20%	83.70%	60.50%	58.10%	34.90%	37.20%	60.47%
Low Bicultural	27	48.10%	40.70%	85.20%	55.60%	48.10%	33.30%	37.00%	40.74%
χ2 test		p<0.001	p=0.001	p=0.008	p<0.001	p=0.001	p=0.004	p=0.011	p<0.001

¹Classification methods defined in Table 2.

²Chi-square statistics test bivariate relationships between each classification method and each respondent characteristics.