Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 19;32(18):1677–1689. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E21-02-0082

TABLE 1:

Comparison of hiPSC-CMs expressing WT or R134G troponin T.

Parameter WT R134G p
Traction force (μN) 0.27 (–0.03/+0.03) 0.17 (–0.03/+0.04) 0.002
Power (pW) 0.10 (–0.02/+0.02) 0.06 (–0.02/+0.03) 0.018
Contraction velocity (μm/s) 0.33 (–0.04/+0.04) 0.22 (–0.04/+0.05) 0.006
Relaxation velocity (μm/s) 0.24 (–0.03/+0.03) 0.18 (–0.03/+0.04) 0.012
Cell area (μm2) 1000 (–50/+50) 1800 (–200/+200) 0.002
Aspect ratio 6.7 (–0.3/+0.2) 6.1 (–0.5/+0.5) 0.028
Sarcomere length (μm) 1.65 (–0.03/+0.04) 1.77 (–0.05/+0.06) 0.004
Sarcomere length on hydrogel (μm) 1.71 (–0.06/+0.06) 1.75 (–0.06/+0.06) 0.342

Average traction force, contraction power, and contraction and relaxation velocities of WT (n = 158) and R134G (n = 97) hiPSC-CMs were measured using traction force microscopy (see Figure 7). Average cell areas, aspect ratios, and sarcomere lengths were determined from immunofluorescence images of WT (n = 120) and R134G (n = 39) hiPSC-CMs on rectangular patterns on glass (see Figure 6). Sarcomere lengths were also measured for WT (n = 33) and R134G (n = 31) hiPSC-CMs on rectangular patterns on hydrogel. Reported uncertainties are 95% confidence intervals determined by bootstrapping.