TABLE 1.
Structured items constituting the final questionnaire.
| Forces | Items |
| New entrants | Customer switching costs* |
| Initial capital requirement* | |
| Brand loyalty* | |
| Government regulation* | |
| Economies of scale* | |
| Cost advantages* | |
| Substitutes | Number of substitutes* |
| Closeness of substitutes* | |
| Buyer propensity to substitutes | |
| Other technologies* | |
| Conformity of substitutes to upstream and downstream technical standards | |
| The degree of technology integration between the substitutes and upstream and downstream | |
| The ready availability of substitutes and emergent of new ones | |
| The degree of close cooperation between substitutes and related industries | |
| Market awareness of alternative brands | |
| The relative price of substitutes | |
| Buyers/ customers | Backward integration* |
| Importance to buyers* | |
| Buyer switching costs* | |
| Dependence on buyer industry* | |
| Buyer portfolio* | |
| Product uniqueness* | |
| Close cooperation with buyer (frequency and years) | |
| Compliance with buyer’s technical standards | |
| Buyer information about demand, actual market price, and suppliers cost | |
| Market awareness of buyer’s brand | |
| Degree of technical integration with buyer | |
| Suppliers | Supplier switching costs* |
| Supplier portfolio (size and quantity, etc.)* | |
| Importance of suppliers* | |
| Forward integration* | |
| Dependence on supplier industry* | |
| Degree of technical integration with suppliers | |
| Close cooperation with suppliers (frequency and years) | |
| Supplier uniqueness | |
| Consistent with supplier’s technical standards | |
| Market awareness of supplier brands | |
| The industry | Differentiation among companies* |
| Industry demand and capacity* | |
| Industry structure* | |
| Exit barriers* | |
| The gap between technology and competitors | |
| Fraud by lawyers, employees, etc. | |
| Potential partnerships with competitors | |
| Existing partnerships with competitors | |
| Government regulation/policy |
*Comes from a classic five forces analysis scale (Lee et al., 2012), others come from the pre-test interview in the Chinese context, as shown in the following tables.