Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 29;31(1):23–30. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013015

Table 2.

Association between catheter appropriateness and risk of complications

Appropriate PICC placement (n=15 128), no. (%) Inappropriate PICC placement (n=23 464), no. (%) OR (95% CI) P value
Occlusion 572 3.78% 2998 12.78% 0.25 (0.21 to 0.29) <0.001
CLABSI 136 0.90% 490 2.09% 0.61 (0.46 to 0.81) 0.001
VTE 214 1.41% 925 3.94% 0.40 (0.33 to 0.47) <0.001
All complications 884 5.84% 4130 17.60% 0.29 (0.25 to 0.34) <0.001

Mixed-effects logistic model including hospital random effects and year fixed effects. All models control for patient characteristics (sex, age, Charlson Comorbidity Score, BMI, history of cancer, indication of current CVC at time of PICC placement, line duration).

BMI, body mass index; CLABSI, central line-associated bloodstream infection; CVC, central venous catheter; PICC, peripherally inserted central catheter; VTE, venous thromboembolism.