Table 1.
Study Characteristics a
| First Author (year) | Study Design | Sample Size, ARIF/ORIF | Sex, M/F | Age, y | Follow-up, mo | Schatzker Classification, I/II/III/IV/V/VI | Quality Score b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verona (2019) 39 | Case-control | 19/21 | 21/19 | 48 ± 16 | 41.95 ± 28.85 | 5/16/19/0/0/0 | 9 (good) |
| Elabjer (2017) 11 | RCT | 40/35 | 58/17 | 47 | 13.5 | 19/33/23/0/0/0 | Low risk of bias |
| Ohdera (2003) 27 | Case-control | 19/9 | 9/19 | 48 | 31.5 | 0/15/13/0/0/0 | 7 (good) |
| Dall’oca (2012) 8 | Case-control | 50/50 | 54/46 | 51 | 73 ± 27 | 14/12/44/8/0/0 | 9 (good) |
| Wang (2017) 41 | Case-control | 26/31 | 36/21 | 46 | 44 ± 11.8 | 9/28/12/8/12/10 | 8 (good) |
| Le Baron (2019) 22 | Case-control | 77/240 | 186/131 | 48 ± 14 | 38 ± 23 | 76/173/68/0/0/0 | 9 (good) |
a Data are presented in M ± SD. ARIF, arthroscopy-assisted reduction percutaneous internal fixation; ORIF, open reduction internal fixation; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
b Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies (good, fair, or poor) and the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (low or high risk of bias).