Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 6;9(34):10507–10517. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i34.10507

Table 3.

Comparison between methods with and without rapid on-site evaluation


FNA alone
FNA with ROSE
FNB alone
FNB with ROSE
Sensitivity 63.19% (95%CI 55.29 to 70.60) 86.45% (95%CI 80.04 to 91.41) 81.66% (95%CI 77.50 to 85.34) 82.97% (95%CI 76.70 to 88.12)
Specificity 96.69% (95%CI 91.75 to 99.06) 100.00% (95%CI 86.77 to 100.00) 100.00% (95%CI 95.04 to 100.00) 100.00% (95%CI 75.29 to 100.00)
Positive likelihood ratio 19.12 (95%CI 7.24 to 50.46) NA 89.82 (95%CI 12.76 to 632.37) NA
Negative likelihood ratio 0.38 (95%CI 0.31 to 0.47) 0.14 (95%CI 0.09 to 0.20) 0.19 (95%CI 0.15 to 0.23) 0.17 (95%CI 0.12 to 0.23)
Positive predictive value 96.26% (95%CI 90.70 to 98.55) 100.00% 99.69% (95%CI 97.88 to 99.96) 100.00%
Negative predictive value 66.10% (95%CI 61.40 to 70.51) 55.32% (95%CI 45.41 to 64.82) 59.89% (95%CI 54.81 to 64.77) 29.55% (95%CI 23.33 to 36.62)
Accuracy 77.46% (95%CI 72.16 to 82.19) 88.40% (95%CI 82.81 to 92.67) 85.43% (95%CI, 82.06 to 88.39) 84.10% (95%CI 78.20 to 88.94)

FNA: Fine needle aspiration; FNB: Fine needle biopsy; ROSE: Rapid on-site evaluation.