Table 2.
NPT component and good practicesb | Mentionsc, n (%) | ||
Coherence (sense-making work): how professionals understand and make sense of the new service (n=38, 17%) | |||
|
Communication is comprehensive and continuous:
|
28 (13) | |
|
The implementation process is consistent:
|
7 (3) | |
|
The use of the service is justified:
|
3 (1) | |
Cognitive participation (relational work): how professionals engage and participate in the service (n=20, 9%) | |||
|
Opportunities for influence have been given:
|
15 (7) | |
|
The attitude toward the service is positive:
|
5 (2) | |
Collective action (enacting work): the work that individuals (professionals) and organizations have to do to enact the new service (n=136, 60%) | |||
|
Support is provided from several fast and efficient sources:
|
39 (17) | |
|
Sufficient time is provided for familiarization with the service:
|
36 (16) | |
|
Enough knowledge of the service is provided:
|
31 (14) | |
|
The training is targeted according to work tasks and competence:
|
18 (8) | |
|
Various teaching methods are provided:
|
12 (5) | |
Reflexive monitoring (appraisal work): how professionals reflect on or appraise the effects of the services (n=30, 13%) | |||
|
The service is easy to use:
|
12 (5) | |
|
Usage monitoring takes place:
|
9 (4) | |
|
Giving feedback on the service is possible:
|
5 (2) | |
|
The service supports work tasks:
|
4 (2) |
aNPT: normalization process theory.
bThe categories inside the NPT’s components are sorted in the order in which the participants mentioned the most.
cHow many times the participants mentioned this category.