Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jun 26;24(1):132–143. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04293-y

Table 6.

Distribution of patients by risk score stratified by diverted versus nota

Total operations, n (column % / row %)
Risk Decile: Point Range Number of Patients Not Diverted (n=37,950) Number of Patients Diverted (n=3,960)
Risk Decile 1: −10 to −5 points 92 (<1% / 100%) 0 (0% / 0%)
Risk Decile 2: −4 to −1 points 589 (2% / 100%) 0 (0% / 0%)
Risk Decile 3: 0 to 3 points 2,898 (8% / 98%) 56 (1% / 2%)
Risk Decile 4: 4 to 7 points 7,424 (20% / 97%) 252 (6% / 3%)
Risk Decile 5: 8 to 11 points 10,514 (28% / 93%) 783 (20% / 7%)
Risk Decile 6: 12 to 15 points 9,056 (24% / 89%) 1138 (29% / 11%)
Risk Decile 7: 16 to 19 points 5,085 (13% / 84%) 975 (25% / 16%)
Risk Decile 8: 20 to 23 points 1,779 (5% / 77%) 545 (14% / 23%)
Risk Decile 9: 24 to 28 points 474 (1% / 71%) 190 (5% / 29%)
Risk Decile 10: 29 to 34 points 39 (<1% / 65%) 21 (1% / 35%)
a

First thickened line indicates where predicted anastomotic leak rate crosses 5% and second thickened black line indicates where predicted anastomotic leak rate crosses 10%