Table 4.
Risk Factors Associated With ETEC Infection in the Entire Study Population
| Risk Factors | COR | P Value | AOR | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDMN | ||||
| Seasonal pattern (April–June/September–November) | 2 (1.48–2.7) | 0 | 1.58 (1.16–2.18) | .004 |
| Duration of diarrhea: 4+ days | 1.01 (0.57–1.79) | .975 | NA | NA |
| Bloody/semisolid/solid | 0.35 (0.05–2.53) | .297 | NA | NA |
| Age: 5+ years | 1.13 (0.87–1.48) | .357 | NA | NA |
| Male | 0.81 (0.62–1.06) | .124 | NA | NA |
| Literacy | 0.88 (0.6–1.3) | .514 | NA | NA |
| Family member 5+ | 1.07 (0.8–1.43) | .663 | NA | NA |
| Tube well use | 1.54 (0.89–2.69) | .126 | NA | NA |
| Latrine use | 0.81 (0.43–1.51) | .505 | NA | NA |
| Soap use | 1.79 (0.94–3.42) | .079 | 1.63 (0.92–3.28) | .129 |
| Severe dehydration | 1.64 (1.01–2.66) | .047 | 1.52 (0.77–2.67) | .181 |
| Vomiting | 0.99 (0.76–1.29) | .959 | NA | NA |
| Fever | 0.91 (0.7–1.18) | .469 | NA | NA |
| Host Community | ||||
| Seasonal pattern (April–June/September–November) | 1.96 (1.09–3.52) | .024 | 1.24 (0.632–2.488) | .534 |
| Duration of diarrhea: 4+ days | 0.38 (0.05–2.78) | .342 | NA | NA |
| Bloody/semisolid/solid | 0 (0, Inf) | .981 | NA | NA |
| Age: 5+ years | 1.98 (1.16–3.36) | .012 | 2.389 (1.208–4.869) | .013 |
| Male | 0.8 (0.47–1.37) | .425 | NA | NA |
| Literacy | 1.8 (0.89–3.64) | .1 | NA | NA |
| Family members 5+ | 1.96 (0.99–3.88) | .054 | 1.406 (0.687–3.103) | .37 |
| Tube well use | Infa | NA | NA | NA |
| Latrine use | 0.26 (0.06–1.11) | .069 | 0.214 (0.06–1.363) | .041 |
| Soap use | 1.27 (0.53–3.08) | .593 | NA | NA |
| Severe dehydration | 1.23 (0.38–3.97) | .734 | NA | NA |
| Vomiting | 1.33 (0.78–2.27) | .296 | NA | NA |
| Fever | 1.06 (0.6–1.87) | .829 | NA | NA |
Abbreviations: AOR, adjusted odds ratio; COR, crude odds ratio; ETEC, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli; FDMN, Forcibly Displaced Myanmar Nationals; Inf, infinite; NA, not applicable.
NOTES: CORs, AORs, and P values are generated using logistic regression. For the adjusted model, we selected variables only for those which had an association with ETEC infection with P ≤.10 in the crude analysis.
aThe estimate was not stable due low sample size.