Table 3.

Comparisons of the proposed method with SVM

Algorithm	Accuracy ± standard, %	Sensitivity ± standard, %	Specificity ± standard, %	NPR ± standard, %	PPR ± standard, %
		Breast data
p‐marker	99.77 ± 0.282	99.80 ± 0.264	99.41 ± 1.360	98.52 ± 2.062	99.92 ± 0.195
SVM	98.61 ± 0.524	98.71 ± 0.629	97.82 ± 1.759	91.04 ± 4.065	99.70 ± 0.235
		Prostate data
p‐marker	99.46 ± 0.553	99.57 ± 0.530	98.70 ± 3.718	97.13 ± 3.385	99.83 ± 0.507
SVM	92.60 ± 1.547	95.97 ± 1.484	68.46 ± 9.535	70.41 ± 7.904	95.65 ± 1.546
		Kidney data
p‐marker	99.55 ± 0.617	99.75 ± 0.404	98.25 ± 4.331	98.33 ± 2.609	99.74 ± 0.660
SVM	88.52 ± 1.712	96.61 ± 1.558	31.93 ± 8.586	58.39 ± 13.44	90.89 ± 1.682