Table 1.

Experimental results using the proposed screening model, physician decision, bilateral timing differences, and ANN

No.	PAD	CVD	Diabetes	ΔRT (ms) [7]	Physician decision	Ψ [19, 22]	ANN [19, 22]	Transition probability		Distance estimation		Joint probability
								P 11	P 22	pR	pL
01	√	√	√	48.22	high risk	1.200	[0 1 0]	0.5626	0.4374	0.8221	0.8221	0.6759
02	√	√	×	19.38	low risk	1.140	[0 1 0]	0.5633	0.4367	0.8185	0.8185	0.6699
03	√	√	×	27.39	high risk	0.289	[1 0 0]	0.5500	0.4500	0.8826	0.8826	0.7791
04	×	√	×	15.89	low risk	0.621	[0 1 0]	0.5552	0.4448	0.8588	0.8588	0.7375
05	×	√	×	30.68	high risk	0.522	[0 1 0]	0.6072	0.3928	0.5627	0.5627	0.3167
06	×	√	×	20.82	high risk	0.371	[1 0 0]	0.5600	0.4400	0.8353	0.8353	0.6977
07	×	√	×	13.15	low risk	0.252	[1 0 0]	0.5694	0.4306	0.7860	0.7860	0.6179
08	×	×	×	5.30	normal	0.268	[1 0 0]	0.5363	0.4637	0.9361	0.9361	0.8764
09	×	×	×	6.60	normal	0.290	[1 0 0]	0.5348	0.4652	0.9411	0.9411	0.8856
10	×	×	×	7.90	normal	0.371	[0 1 0]	0.5400	0.4600	0.9232	0.9232	0.8524