Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 20.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 6;56(3):375–386. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01862-4

Table 2.

Adjusted differences in social support scores between veteran and civilian respondents in NESARC-III

Veterans compared to civilians
Social support measure Diff 95% CI p value
Structural social support
 Social network diversity
  Minimal adjustmenta −0.21 −0.30, −0.11 < 0.001
  Full adjustmentb −0.13 −0.23, −0.03 0.01
 Social network size
  Minimal adjustmenta −0.88 −1.71, −0.06 0.04
  Full adjustmentb −0.55 −1.38, 0.28 0.19
Functional social support
Total
  Minimal adjustmenta −0.26 −0.55, 0.03 0.08
  Full adjustmentb −0.002 −0.27, 0.27 0.99
 Appraisal
  Minimal adjustmenta −0.13 −0.25, −0.01 0.03
  Full adjustmentb −0.07 −0.18, 0.04 0.24
 Belonging
  Minimal adjustmenta −0.07 −0.19, 0.05 0.26
  Full adjustmentb 0.03 −0.09, 0.15 0.62
 Tangible
  Minimal adjustmenta −0.06 −0.16, 0.04 0.26
 Full adjustmentb 0.03 −0.06, 0.13 0.48

diff difference, CI confidence interval

a

Adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male vs. female), and race (white vs. non-white)

b

Adjusted for a and education (at least some college vs. no college), employment (employed or in school vs. not employed), and rurality (urban vs. rural), DSM-5 substance-related or addictive disorders (yes vs. no), depressive disorders (yes vs. no), bipolar or related disorders (yes vs. no), anxiety disorders (yes vs. no), post-traumatic stress disorder (yes vs. no), feeding or eating disorders (yes vs. no), and personality disorders (yes vs. no), number of physical health conditions (continuous), childhood maltreatment score (continuous), childhood household dysfunction score (continuous), and childhood use of government assistance (yes vs. no)