Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Sleep Med. 2020 Jan 30;19(1):126–143. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2020.1714625

Table 5.

Comparison of PSPQ responses for children with and without parent reported sleep problem

Parent-Reported Sleep Problem No Parent-Reported Sleep Problem Test statistic

Timinga: M (SD) 1.44 (1.48) 0.94 (1.19) F(2,454)=0.86, p = 0.42
Routines/consistencyb: M (SD) 4.20 (1.54) 3.26 (1.81) F(1,927) = 3.36, p < 0.05
Room environmentc: M (SD) 1.24 (1.32) 0.86 (1.06) F(2,909) = 3.05, p < .05
Δ weekday vs. weekend sleep opportunity: % (n) X2(2) = 8.57, p < 0.05
 Small Δ (< 1 hour) 33.3% (n = 9) 60.7% (n = 256)
 Moderate Δ (1–2 hours) 7.4% (n = 2) 8.1% (n = 35)
 Large Δ (> 2 hours) 59.3% (n = 16) 32.2% (n = 138)
Technology Use: % (n) X2(2) = 4.80, p = 0.0905
 Never 5.6% (n = 4) 11.1% (n = 95)
 Almost never, sometimes 34.7% (n = 25) 41.5% (n = 355)
 Almost always, always 59.7% (n = 43) 47.3% (n = 404)
Needed someone to fall asleep: % (n) X2(2) = 12.56, p < 0.01
 Never 67.6% (n = 48) 77.9% (n = 673)
 Almost never 4.2% (n = 3) 8.8% (n = 76)
 Sometimes, almost always, always 28.2% (n = 20) 13.3% (n = 115)
a

weekday bedtime (time) + weekday sleep opportunity (possible range = 0–4);

b

Followed a bedtime routine + Tried to fall asleep at about the same time every night + Woke up at about the same time every morning (possible range = 0–6);

e

Problems sleeping because too noisy + Problems sleeping because too hot or too cold + Problems sleeping because too much light (possible range = 0–6).