Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 17;2015(4):CD004622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004622.pub3

10. FMS versus FMD: change in BOP.

Tooth type:
 Single‐rooted,
 multi‐rooted,
 or both Baseline pocket depth (mm) Time
 (Months) Number of studies (Participants) Mean difference
 (Random‐effects meta‐analysis) Heterogeneity
 (P value; I2)
Both 5‐6 3/4 1 (27) ‐0.05 [‐0.50, 0.40]; (P = 0.83) Not applicable
Both > 6 3/4 2 (45) 0.41 [‐0.45, 1.27]; (P = 0.35) (P = 0.17); I² = 47%
Both 5‐6 6/8 0 (0) Not estimable Not applicable
Both > 6 6/8 1 (18) ‐0.51 [‐1.24, 0.22]; (P = 0.17) Not applicable
Single‐rooted 5‐6 3/4 1 (18) 0.71 [0.31, 1.11]; (P = 0.0005) Not applicable
Single‐rooted > 6 3/4 0 (0) Not estimable Not applicable
Single‐rooted 5‐6 6/8 2 (42) ‐0.09 [‐0.30, 0.11]; (P = 0.38) (P = 0.44); I² = 0%
Single‐rooted > 6 6/8 1 (24) 0.56 [‐0.37, 1.49]; (P = 0.24) Not applicable
Multi‐rooted 5‐6 3/4 1 (18) 1.53 [0.89, 2.17]; (P < 0.00001) Not applicable
Multi‐rooted > 6 3/4 0 (0) Not estimable Not applicable
Multi‐rooted 5‐6 6/8 2 (42) ‐0.02 [‐0.53, 0.49]; (P = 0.93) (P = 0.06); I² = 73%
Multi‐rooted > 6 6/8 1 (24) 0.74 [0.17, 1.31]; (P = 0.01) Not applicable