Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Sep 27;35(12):1065–1075. doi: 10.1177/15459683211046272

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The effect of motor state on ipsilesional/nondominant (i/nd) and contralesional/dominant (c/d)M1 TMS-evoked beta coherence (mean ± SD) in (A) controls and (B) stroke survivors. (A) During active ipsilateral plantarflexion, coherence consistently decreased in controls, regardless of hemisphere of stimulation (*p=.03). (B) In the stroke group, no differences between rest and active plantarflexion conditions were observed (p=.66) and high inter-individual variability in responses was observed. In the stroke group, there was a trend towards a main effect of hemisphere of stimulation, where coherence during iM1 TMS was greater than cM1 TMS, regardless of condition (∞p=.09).