Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 30;55(6):1568–1575. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00492-5

Table 2.

Leg length difference

Early follow-up FU at skeletal maturity* Change (95% CI) p value
Total LLD 9.5 (7.6) 10.9 (9.4) 1.4 (− 1.5–4.4) 0.337
Femoral difference 8.1 (6.5) 9.8 (8.7) 1.7 (− 0.2–1.9) 0.074
Tibial difference 0.7 (2.8) 1.8 (3.9) 1.1 (− 0.6–1.4) 0.192
Total LLD stratified for treatment group
 Closed reduction (n = 4) 7.5 (4.5) 7.8 (6.4) 0.3 (− 3.3–3.8) 0.836
 Open reduction (n = 4) 9.5 (8.4) 9.5 (10.6) 0.0 (− 10.3–10.3) 0.999
 OR and femoral osteotomy (n = 7) 10.3 (9.7) 12.6 (11.5) 2.3 (− 3.6–8.1) 0.375
 OR and pelvic osteotomy (n = 3) 4.7 (4.2) 11.0 (8.9) 6.3 (− 13.0–25.6) 0.293
 OR and femoral and pelvic osteotomy (n = 9) 11.4 (7.8) 11.7 (10.1) 0.2 (− 7.6–8.1) 0.950

Data presented as mean (standard deviation), comparison using paired samples t-test

CI confidence interval, LLD leg length difference, OR open reduction

*Measurement at skeletal maturity X-ray or at moment of epiphysiodesis for epiphysiodesis patients