Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 28;32(10):1538–1551. doi: 10.1177/0898264320944289

Table 4.

Cross-Sectional Associations of Perceived Environmental Barriers to Outdoor Mobility with Walking Modifications in Community-Dwelling Older People. Odds are Reported for those with Adaptive Modifications (n = 319) and Maladaptive Modifications (n = 227) versus those with No Modifications (n = 281, reference).

Barrier Model 1 Model 2
Adaptive walking modifications (n = 319) Maladaptive walking modifications (n = 227) Adaptive walking modifications (n = 319) Maladaptive walking modifications (n = 227)
OR (95% CI) Adjusted p-value OR (95% CI) Adjusted p-value OR (95% CI) Adjusted p-value OR (95% CI) Adjusted p-value
Sum of nature barriers
 1 versus 0 2.3 (1.6–3.3) <.001 2.1 (1.4–3.1) <.001 1.8 (1.2–2.7) .014 1.2 (.8–1.9) .609
 2 versus 0 5.0 (1.6–3.3) <.001 4.2 (2.3–7.5) <.001 3.5 (2.0–6.2) <.001 2.0 (1.0–3.8) .128
Sum of infrastructure barriers
 1 versus 0 1.6 (1.1–2.5) .065 1.9 (1.2–3.1) .023 1.4 (.9–2.1) .339 1.3 (.8–2.3) .494
 ≥2 versus 0 3.8 (2.3–6.3) <.001 5.1 (3.0–8.6) <.001 2.5 (1.4–4.2) .006 2.3 (1.3–4.2) .029
Sum of safety barriers
 1 versus 0 1.5 (1.0–2.3) .155 .9 (.5–1.5) .775 1.3 (.8–2.0) .500 .7 (.4–1.3) .468
 ≥2 versus 0 2.1 (1.3–3.7) .018 1.2 (.6–2.2) .730 1.4 (.8–2.4) .494 .6 (.3–1.2) .305
Item specific
 Nature
  Hills in the nearby environment 2.6 (1.7–4.0) <.001 3.0 (1.8–4.7) <.001 2.0 (1.2–3.2) .018 1.9 (1.1–3.3) .060
  Snow and ice in winter 2.8 (2.0–4.0) <.001 2.0 (1.4–3.0) <.001 2.2 (1.6–3.2) <.001 1.2 (.8–1.8) .644
 Infrastructure
  Poor street condition 1.4 (.9–2.2) .194 1.2 (.7–1.9) .626 1.1 (.7–1.7) .911 .7 (.4–1.2) .291
  High curbs 3.1 (1.3–7.4) .028 4.6 (1.9–11.0) .004 1.7 (.6–4.4) .472 1.2 (.4–3.3) .872
  Lack of pedestrian zones 2.2 (.8–6.6) .242 2.7 (.9–8.5) .159 2.9 (.9–9.5) .210 3.6 (1.0–13.3) .162
  Long distances to services 2.0 (1.0–4.1) .111 6.1 (3.1–11.9) <.001 1.8 (.8–3.8) .275 4.5 (2.1–9.6) <.001
  Lack of resting places, summer 3.1 (1.7–5.5) <.001 3.9 (2.2–7.1) <.001 2.0 (1.1–3.7) .085 2.1 (1.1–4.0) .094
  Lack of resting places, winter 3.4 (2.0–5.7) <.001 3.2 (1.8–5.6) <.001 2.3 (1.3–4.0) .018 1.8 (1.0–3.3) .178
  Poor lighting 2.3 (.9–5.8) .151 .7 (.2–2.6) .755 1.7 (.6–4.7) .447 .4 (.1–1.7) .380
 Safety
  Noisy traffic 3.2 (1.2–8.9) .065 2.2 (.7–6.9) .282 2.1 (.7–6.3) .348 1.5 (.4–5.3) .730
  Busy traffic 2.5 (1.3–4.8) .028 2.2 (1.1–4.6) .094 1.8 (.9–3.8) .229 1.5 (.7–3.4) .502
  Dangerous crossroads 1.8 (1.0–3.3) .106 1.2 (.6–2.4) .722 1.4 (.8–2.6) .473 .9 (.4–1.8) .840
  Vehicles on walkways 1.1 (.3–4.4) .922 1.5 (.4–6.3) .726 .8 (.2–3.4) .872 .7 (.1–3.9) .864
  Cyclists in the walkways 1.4 (.9–2.2) .182 .8 (.5–1.3) .428 1.1 (.7–1.8) .809 .5 (.3–.9) .064
  Insecurity due to other pedestrians 1.6 (.8–3.3) .288 1.0 (.4–2.4) .992 1.0 (.5–2.2) .981 .4 (.2–1.2) .257

Note. Multinomial logistic regression analyses. Reference category: no walking modifications. Model 1: Adjusted for age and sex. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, years of education, depressive symptoms, chronic conditions, and lower extremity function. OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval. False discovery rates (adjusted p-values) were calculated to correct for multiple testing. Statistically significant values are bolded.