Table 2.
Features of papers
| Author, year and country | Stated aim | Participant characteristics | Method of data collection | Analytical approach | Themes/decisions examined | Setting | Range of capacity of person with dementia |
| Bloomer et al 2016 Australia13 |
Explore the experiences of family carers of people with dementia who are hospitalised | 20 carers age range 34–92 equal gender distribution mixture of spouses, adult children and friends (no details provided) |
Individual face to face interviews | Thematic analysis | Experience of transitioning through the hospital system | Hospital | Not mentioned |
| Carter 2018 UK14 |
Exploring the experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making of a relative living with advanced dementia | 20 carers 75% female 4 siblings, 2 spouse, 13 children, 1 extended family member |
Face to face interviews | Thematic analysis | Experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making on healthcare needs | Nursing home | Not mentioned |
| DeBellis 2017 Australia15 |
To explore relatives’ experience, knowledge and perceptions of challenging behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and association with antipsychotic use for persons with dementia in residential aged care. | Six participants all F age 45–62, four daughters, one wife, one daughter in law |
Face to face interviews | Thematic analysis | Experiences, knowledge and perceptions of antipsychotic medication use for the person with dementia | Residential care home | Not mentioned |
| Dening 2017 UK16 |
To understand the lived context of healthcare decision-making in the past, present and future for people with dementia and their family carer | Six carers age 49–85 Five spouses, 1 adult child |
Face to face interviews | Thematic analysis | Healthcare decision-making in the past, present and future | Memory clinic service | Had capacity to participate in the study |
| Elliot 2007 USA17 |
Investigating the decision-making of family members of institutionalised older adults with advanced cognitive impairment, with particular focus on spirituality and meaning | 39 family members average age 62 4 same generation (spouse/sibling) 35 adult children |
Focus groups | Constant comparative method | Healthcare decisions | Nursing home | Not mentioned |
| Griffiths 2020 UK18 |
Decision-making in cancer care for people living with dementia | 22 family relatives Female (64%) Relationship to participant Child 55% Spouse 32% Sibling 9% Grandchild 5% |
Face to face interview with relatives | Thematic analysis | Decisions on healthcare needs | Hospital setting | Full capacity |
| Jamieson 2016 Australia19 |
Investigating the experience of people with dementia and their carers when transitioning from home to hospital | 30 carers 87% female |
Started with focus groups, but as these were difficult for carers to access, changed to individual telephone interviews | Thematic analysis | Decisions on health and social care needs during transitions home from hospital | Decisions on health and social care needs during transitions home from hospital | Not mentioned |
| Livingston 2010 UK20 |
Exploring how carers make decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity | Focus groups: 43 participants Individual interviews: 46 |
Focus groups to generate the list of difficult decisions, Individual interviews to explore in depth | Grounded theory | Decisions on health and social needs | Primary care clinics | Not mentioned |
| McWilliams 2018 UK21 |
To investigate cancer-related information needs and treatment decision-making experiences of people with cancer dementi a, their informal caregivers and oncology health care professionals | Nine carers mean age 73.6 44% female 56% spouse, 44% child |
Face to face interviews | Thematic analysis | Decisions on healthcare needs | Hospital setting | People with dementia ranged from having full capacity to no capacity |
| Shanley 2017 Australia22 |
Providing support to surrogate decision-makers for people living with dementia: healthcare professional, organisational and community responsibilities | 34 surrogate decision-makers. 79% female 85% adult children mean age 57.4 |
Individual face to face or telephone interviews | Thematic analysis | Decisions included residential care, giving up driving, consenting to medical treatment and end of life | Community or in a residential aged care setting | Not mentioned |
| Sinclair 2018 Australia23 |
Explore how couples with dementia experience healthcare, lifestyle, and everyday decision-making | 15 carers Aged 59–82 60% female All spouse partners |
Face to face interviews, 6 individuals, 9 couple dyad interviews |
Thematic analysis | Decisions on healthcare, lifestyle, and everyday decision-making | Community and residential care settings | Not mentioned |
| Thompson 2021 Canada24 |
Clarifying the information and support needs of family caregivers of nursing home residents with advancing dementia | 17 family caregivers Female (70.6%) Male (29.4%) |
Face to face interviews with bereaved family caregivers of persons with dementia | Thematic analysis | Decisions on healthcare needs | Nursing home setting | Not mentioned |
| Truglio-Londri gan 2018 USA26 |
To identify Alzheimers disease-specific decisions that past and present caregivers faced over the disease trajectory | 13 carers 85% female Nine adult children, Three spouses |
Focus groups | Thematic analysis | Decisions on health and social care needs | Community setting | Not mentioned |
| Walker 2001 UK26 | Investigating how we facilitate carer’s involvement in decision-making? | 20 carers of people with dementia No further details on participants provided |
Face to face individual interviews | Constant comparative method | Decisions on healthcare needs | Hospital setting | Not mentioned |
| Wolfs 2012 The Netherlands27 |
Gaining carer’s insights into the decision-making process about treatment and care in dementia patients | 26 carers 50% female 11 spouses, 12 adult children,3 other |
Brief individual interviews inform interview schedule, then focus groups | Grounded theory | Decisions on healthcare needs | Community setting | Not mentioned |