Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e052608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052608

Table 2.

Features of papers

Author, year and country Stated aim Participant characteristics Method of data collection Analytical approach Themes/decisions examined Setting Range of capacity of person with dementia
Bloomer et al
2016
Australia13
Explore the experiences of family carers of people with dementia who are hospitalised 20 carers age range 34–92
equal gender distribution mixture of spouses, adult children and friends (no details provided)
Individual face to face interviews Thematic analysis Experience of transitioning through the hospital system Hospital Not mentioned
Carter
2018
UK14
Exploring the experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making of a relative living with advanced dementia 20 carers
75% female
4 siblings, 2
spouse, 13
children, 1 extended family member
Face to face interviews Thematic analysis Experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making on healthcare needs Nursing home Not mentioned
DeBellis
2017
Australia15
To explore relatives’ experience, knowledge and perceptions of challenging behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and association with antipsychotic use for persons with dementia in residential aged care. Six participants all F age 45–62,
four daughters, one wife, one daughter in law
Face to face interviews Thematic analysis Experiences, knowledge and perceptions of antipsychotic medication use for the person with dementia Residential care home Not mentioned
Dening
2017
UK16
To understand the lived context of healthcare decision-making in the past, present and future for people with dementia and their family carer Six carers age 49–85
Five spouses, 1 adult child
Face to face interviews Thematic analysis Healthcare decision-making in the past, present and future Memory clinic service Had capacity to participate in the study
Elliot
2007
USA17
Investigating the decision-making of family members of institutionalised older adults with advanced cognitive impairment, with particular focus on spirituality and meaning 39 family members average age 62
4 same generation (spouse/sibling)
35 adult children
Focus groups Constant comparative method Healthcare decisions Nursing home Not mentioned
Griffiths
2020
UK18
Decision-making in cancer care for people living with dementia 22 family relatives
Female (64%)
Relationship to participant
Child 55%
Spouse 32%
Sibling 9%
Grandchild 5%
Face to face interview with relatives Thematic analysis Decisions on healthcare needs Hospital setting Full capacity
Jamieson
2016
Australia19
Investigating the experience of people with dementia and their carers when transitioning from home to hospital 30 carers
87% female
Started with focus groups, but as these were difficult for carers to access, changed to individual telephone interviews Thematic analysis Decisions on health and social care needs during transitions home from hospital Decisions on health and social care needs during transitions home from hospital Not mentioned
Livingston
2010
UK20
Exploring how carers make decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity Focus groups: 43 participants
Individual interviews: 46
Focus groups to generate the list of difficult decisions, Individual interviews to explore in depth Grounded theory Decisions on health and social needs Primary care clinics Not mentioned
McWilliams
2018
UK21
To investigate cancer-related information needs and treatment decision-making experiences of people with cancer dementi a, their informal caregivers and oncology health care professionals Nine carers mean age 73.6
44% female
56% spouse,
44% child
Face to face interviews Thematic analysis Decisions on healthcare needs Hospital setting People with dementia ranged from having full capacity to no capacity
Shanley
2017
Australia22
Providing support to surrogate decision-makers for people living with dementia: healthcare professional, organisational and community responsibilities 34 surrogate decision-makers.
79% female
85% adult children mean age 57.4
Individual face to face or telephone interviews Thematic analysis Decisions included residential care, giving up driving, consenting to medical treatment and end of life Community or in a residential aged care setting Not mentioned
Sinclair
2018
Australia23
Explore how couples with dementia experience healthcare, lifestyle, and everyday decision-making 15 carers
Aged 59–82
60% female
All spouse partners
Face to face interviews, 6
individuals, 9 couple dyad interviews
Thematic analysis Decisions on healthcare, lifestyle, and everyday decision-making Community and residential care settings Not mentioned
Thompson
2021
Canada24
Clarifying the information and support needs of family caregivers of nursing home residents with advancing dementia 17 family caregivers
Female (70.6%)
Male (29.4%)
Face to face interviews with bereaved family caregivers of persons with dementia Thematic analysis Decisions on healthcare needs Nursing home setting Not mentioned
Truglio-Londri gan
2018
USA26
To identify Alzheimers disease-specific decisions that past and present caregivers faced over the disease trajectory 13 carers
85% female
Nine adult children,
Three spouses
Focus groups Thematic analysis Decisions on health and social care needs Community setting Not mentioned
Walker 2001 UK26 Investigating how we facilitate carer’s involvement in decision-making? 20 carers of people with dementia
No further details on participants provided
Face to face individual interviews Constant comparative method Decisions on healthcare needs Hospital setting Not mentioned
Wolfs
2012
The Netherlands27
Gaining carer’s insights into the decision-making process about treatment and care in dementia patients 26 carers
50% female
11 spouses, 12 adult children,3 other
Brief individual interviews inform interview schedule, then focus groups Grounded theory Decisions on healthcare needs Community setting Not mentioned