Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 7;12:766405. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.766405

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Performance comparison of different bias settings for tascCODA on simulated data with the effect being located near the root of the tree, depending on effect size. Performance measured by (A) Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). (B) False discovery rate (FDR) (C) Hamming distance between ground truth and determined effects.