Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e055160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055160

Table 1.

Reasons provided by adolescents for acceptability and unacceptability of interventions, by type of intervention

Type of intervention Reasons given for acceptability Reasons given for unacceptability
eHealth Knowledge provided on sexual health and HIV25 34 Visual content considered not culturally appropriate23
Privacy23 48 Conservative views about certain topics discussed (eg, oral sex)25 65
Increased self-efficacy to manage risky situations34 Concerns around access and inclusiveness, as not all youth owned devices65 73
Ease of use34 Fear of accidental disclosure of confidential information through device-sharing73
Supportive mentors29 Technical glitches with devices48 65
Freedom to talk openly to mentors about HIV status and disclosure29
Vaccines Protection from HPV in the case of sexual abuse or transactional sex36 Distrust of government and scientists61
Protection from HIV infection when the transmission risk is out of an individual’s control45 61 Association of vaccine uptake with promiscuity61
Desire to have unprotected sex for childbearing (women on HIV-vaccine)61 Fear of HIV testing and HIV stigma61
Being able to have unprotected sex and multiple sexual partners (male adolescents on HIV vaccine)61 Cost of vaccine61
Protection in serodiscordant relationships while avoiding the HIV stigma and costs related to buying condoms
(male adolescents on HIV vaccine)45
Fear of vaccine side effects51 61 63 77
Fear of injection77
Lack of knowledge about vaccine and cervical cancer36 52 56
HIV testing Confidentiality of HIV self-testing at schools44,76 74 Concern with validity of HIVST self-test kit results64 76
Ease of use of HIV self-test44 76 Costs of HIV test kit64
Fast results of self-test44 Lack of emotional support with self-test64 76
Ability to test independently with self-test64 Fear of the procedure (finger prick)30 75
Opportunity to know HIV status, for peace of mind and to plan for the future (provider-initiated testing)39 Belief that school is not the right place for HIV testing74
Lower waiting time, less distance to facility, and friendlier staff at mobile (vs ‘conventional’) clinic67 Lack of privacy and risk of stigma through school testing74
Support group Emotional and social support provided42 47 53 55
Knowledge and skills provided42 55
Enjoyed participating53
Stigma free environment54
Confidential space to openly discuss sexual health and behaviour42 53
Greater decision-making autonomy to negotiate safer sexual relationships42
SRH education Increased knowledge on sexual and reproductive health24 41 Conservative views about certain topics discussed (linked to sexual intercourse)41
Supportive teachers at youth clubs41
Girls more comfortable attending school during menstruation24
VMMC Material support provided during the intervention (eg, food, shelter and security)58 Penile swelling after removal and transient discolouration of inner foreskin111
Knowledge gained through participation58
Economic support Increased school retention28 38 78 Concerns with sustainability and impact of transfer termination78
Financial autonomy28 78 Exclusion of certain households or individuals in the community from receiving transfers28 38
Easy access to cash transfer28 Perception that selection process was unfair38
Lack of interest in family planning services accessible through (conditional) benefit cards112
Contraception Ease of use of self-injectable and female contraceptives66 113 Conservative views on condom use and messaging (eg, using condoms is a sin, condoms may encourage early sexual debut)32 70
Privacy and convenience of self-injectable contraceptives113 Belief that adolescents are too young for condom promotion and sexual activity3
Female autonomy to control female contraceptive use45 66 Fear of needles and self-injection for injectable contraceptives113
Condom fatigue and HIV fear45 Concerns with not being able to use condoms properly70
Belief that condoms cause AIDS and other diseases70
Concerns about the effect of cervical contraceptive being in the body for a long time66
Concern with stigma45
Waiting times at health facilities45
PrEP Prevents transmission in serodiscordant couples45 Conflict with traditional methods and beliefs45
Easy to use45 Fear of side effects45
Psychosocial home-based care Programme more relevant to caregiver vs adolescent needs72
Lack of financial support in a context of widespread poverty72

PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; VMMC, voluntary medical male circumcision.