Table 2. Growth Rate and Product Yields for Malate and Fumarate Relative to Biomass Either Predicted by FBA or Experimentally Observed during the Exponential Phase in Wild-Type Synechocystis and Derivative Strains Impaired in Malate Consumption Reactionsa2.
growth
rate (μ, h–1) |
malate
yield (Yp/x, mM gDW–1) |
fumarate
yield (Yp/x, mM gDW–1) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
strains | model prediction | measured | model prediction | measured | model prediction | measured |
wild type | 0.052 | 0.055 ± 0.001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Δme | 0.052 | 0.052 ± 0.000 | 0 | 0.067 ± 0.019 | 0 | 0.274 ± 0.014 |
Δmdh | 0.052 | 0.055 ± 0.000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ΔmeΔmdh | 0.050 | 0.050 ± 0.001 | 0–0.860 | 0.607 ± 0.091 | 0–0.860 | 0.557 ± 0.002 |
FVA was used for evaluating the robustness of the network and predicting the expected range for malate and/or fumarate production. The biomass equation was always used as the primary objective function in all FBA and FVA simulations. The experimental data are referred to the batch cultivation reported in Figure 2.