Table 1.
Comparisons | Allele-Specific RT-qPCR | Targeted/Sanger Sequencing | WGS |
---|---|---|---|
Costa | $ | $$ | $$$ (Depends on batch size) |
Real-world TAT, d | 0–2 | 2–7 | 3–10 |
Advantages | Rapid TAT to affect mAb choice; widely available; easy-to-define targets | Potentially shorter TAT than WGS; potentially more widely available | Outbreak investigation; novel mutation identification; no need to redevelop assay to identify new variants |
Disadvantages | Limited targets; need for continuous updates to include new variants | Limited targets | Greater informatics expertise; higher cost; longer TAT |
Abbreviations: mAb, monoclonal antibody; RT-qPCR, reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TAT, turnaround time; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.
aReagent costs for WGS can be as low as $30–$40 per sample if sufficient batch size is obtained. Given that none of these tests are highly automated, labor costs comprise a significant proportion of the total cost.