Table 4.
Comparison of computation times (s) of five methods in the analysis of MHPR. Note that for SC-MEB, we used a sequence of 
from 8 to 27 and a sequence of 
from 0 to 4
| ID |
|
SC-MEB | BayesSpace | GMM | Giotto | Louvain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 1 027 848 | 16 647 | - | 107 914 | 11 940 | 45 884 |
| 1 | 73 665 | 1390 | - | 14 288 | 744 | 287 |
| 1-1 | 1 1738 | 318 | 16 152 | 2192 | 153 | 10 |
| 1-2 | 12 672 | 349 | 17 238 | 2267 | 172 | 13 |
| 1-3 | 12 556 | 357 | 19 071 | 2332 | 170 | 17 |
| 1-4 | 11 763 | 326 | 15 459 | 2293 | 150 | 10 |
| 1-5 | 12 306 | 383 | 16 818 | 2130 | 160 | 10 |
| 1-6 | 12 620 | 332 | 18 366 | 2234 | 164 | 14 |