Table 3.
State budgetary allocation for health | State Social Health Insurance Scheme |
---|---|
Strengths include existence of - Explicit minimum service package which was revised in 2018 - Essential medicines list and generics-only policy - Referral guidelines - Service delivery and quality standards Weaknesses include lack of - Implementation of gate-keeping - Transparency to clients about entitlements and obligations - Adherence to generics-only policy by health facilities |
Strengths include existence of - Explicit minimum service package which was revised in 2018 - Essential medicines list - Mechanisms for systematic periodic review of MSP using evidence of disease burden - Referral guidelines and gate-keeping policies - Standard treatment guidelines and standards for the quality of care delivered Weaknesses include lack of - Incentives or disincentives to clients for compliance or non-compliance with the gate-keeping policy - Incentives or disincentives to service providers for compliance or non-compliance with the referral guideline |
Opportunities | Opportunities |
Work with the SHIS to align on an evidence-informed and participatory process for review of the service package Leverage already existing communication channels to inform beneficiaries of their entitlements and obligations |
Align evidence-informed and participatory process for review of the service package with the MOH process |
Threats | Threats |
Direct access to higher level care and no adherence to generics-only policy can lead to unproductive cost escalation | Direct access to higher level care can lead to cost escalation resulting in financial unsustainability |