Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 21;21:2267. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12308-0

Table 2.

Fully adjusted results of mixed-effect logistic regressions predicting the effect of family support on sleep problems

Model 1: Sleep Dysfunction (≧1 sleep problem) Model 2: Sleep Duration (< 6 h of sleep) Model 3: Sleep Quality (poor sleep quality)
Risk Ratio (95% CI)
Family support (z-score) 0.94 (0.90 - 0.98)** 0.88 (0.81 - 0.95)** 0.92 (0.87 - 0.98) *
Friend support (z-score) 0.98 (0.01 - 1.03) 0.95 (0.88 - 1.04) 0.99 (0.92 - 1.06)
Gender & sexuality
 Homosexual man Reference group
 Homosexual woman 0.94 (0.79 - 1.09) 0.75 (0.52 - 1.07) 1.01 (0.78 - 1.30)
 Bisexual man 0.95 (0.81 - 1.11) 1.09 (0.77 - 1.48) 1.00 (0.75 - 1.28)
 Bisexual woman 1.15 (1.00 - 1.29)* 1.11 (0.83 - 1.47) 1.22 (0.97 - 1.50)
 Other man 1.03 (0.86 - 1.21) 1.13 (0.78 - 1.57) 0.99 (0.73 - 1.30)
 Other woman 1.15 (1.00 - 1.31) 1.52 (1.13 - 1.98) ** 1.30 (1.01 - 1.62)*
Neighbourhood cohesion 0.94 (0.89 - 1.00) 0.82 (0.72 - 0.93)** 0.88 (0.88 - 0.97)*

All models above included additional controls for region-level fixed-effect, year fixed-effect, wave fixed-effect, household fixed-effect, ethnicity, marital status, age (in natural log units), personal income (in £1000), highest qualification, SF-12 PCS, chronic health problems, clinical depression, frequent use of sleep aid, and substance use

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.011