Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 28;13(5):2516. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2516

Table 4. Comparison of different device types.

ACP=amplatzer cardiac plug; WM=watchman; PC=percutaneous snaring; IQR= interquartile range

Variable ACP N=59 WM N=31 Amulet N=11 P-Value
Intraoperative embolizations 29 (49.2%) 8(25.8%) 3 (27.3%) 0.066
Site of Embolization
Left atrium 08 01 0
Left ventricle 06 01 0
Descending aorta/Abdominal aorta 02 3 0
Arch of aorta/Ascending aorta 02 0 0
Aortic bifurcation/Iliac bifurcation 02 0 1
Mitral valve apparatus 02 0 1
Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) 0 0 0
Unknown 07 03 1
Postoperative embolization 30 (50.8) 23 (74.2%) 8 (72.7%)
Site of Embolization
Left atrium 7 1 0
Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) 4 1 1
Ascending aorta/Arch of aorta 1 1 1
Descending aorta/Abdominal aorta 3 9 0
Aortic/Iliac bifurcation 0 1 1
Mitral valve apparatus 3 0 1
Left ventricular cavity 5 0 1
Unknown 7 10 3
Complications 19 (32.2%) 12 (38.7%) 6 (54.5%) 0.35
Surgery 13 10 3
Valvular damage 1 1
Internal bleeding 0 2 (while PC snaring) 0
Stroke/TIA 2 0 0
Myocardial infarction 2 0 1
Cardiogenic shock 1 0 2
Limb ischemia 0 0 1
Death 7 1 0
Retrieval process
Surgery 13 (22%) 10 (32.2%) 3 (27.3%) 0.568
Percutaneous snaring 46 (78%) 21 (67.8%) 8 (72.7%) 0.568
Compression factor (IQR) 14.1% (11.3-24.5%) 19% (14.1-19%) 23% (19.8-30.9%)