Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 21;10:e72264. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72264

Table 1. Protonation states of Glu68 and Asp234.

Changes in the protonation states are in bold. – indicates not applicable.

Fixed state during MD* Calculated state after MD
Wild-type (1) E68 Protonated Protonated
D234 Deprotonated Deprotonated
Wild-type (2) E68 Protonated Protonated
D234 Protonated Deprotonated
Wild-type (3) E68 Deprotonated Protonated
D234 Protonated Deprotonated
E68D (1) D68 Protonated Protonated
D234 Deprotonated Deprotonated
E68D (2) D68 Deprotonated Protonated
D234 Deprotonated Deprotonated
E68Q (1) Q68
D234 Deprotonated Deprotonated
E68Q (2) Q68
D234 Protonated Deprotonated
D234E (1) E68 Protonated Protonated
E234 Deprotonated Deprotonated
D234E (2) E68 Protonated Protonated
E234 Protonated Protonated
D234N (1) E68 Deprotonated Deprotonated
N234
D234N (2) E68 Protonated Protonated §
N234
E68Q/D234N Q68
N234
*

The system was equilibrated for 5 ns. 10 conformations were sampled at 0.1 ns intervals during the 1 ns production run.

Protonation patterns obtained using the MD-generated conformations.

Although we were able to obtain the MD-generated conformation with protonated Glu68 and protonated Glu234, which was confirmed in the calculated protonation pattern, the conformation cannot reproduce the experimentally measured absorption wavelength (Supplementary file 1D) and is unlikely relevant to the D234E GtACR1.

§

Although we were able to obtain the MD-generated conformation with protonated Glu68, which was confirmed in the calculated protonation pattern, the protonation state is not consistent with deprotonated Glu68 suggested in FTIR studies by Dreier et al., 2021.