Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):98–104. doi: 10.7150/ijms.65343

Table 2.

Comparison of yield and quality of RNA isolated from rabbit cartilage using modified methodologies*

RNA Quality Comparison Method 1a
Method 1b
Method 1c
Method 2a
Method 2b
Method 2c
Method Details Trizol/RNeasy Hybrid with Proteinase K and QIAshredder Trizol/RNeasy
Hybrid with
Proteinase K
Trizol/RNeasy
Hybrid without Proteinase K
Modified RNaqueous with Proteinase K and QIAshredder Modified RNaqueous with Proteinase K Modified RNaqueous without Proteinase K
Number of
samples tested
24 9 1 1 2 2
UV absorbance
260/280 (average)
1.9 1.8 2.9 2.2 0.0 5.2
UV absorbance
260/230 (average)
1.2 0.9 1.8 1.0 0.0 0.0
Bioanalyzer
Concentration (ng/μl) (average)
58 38 8.1 0.8 0.0 0.1
Bioanalyzer
Total Yield (μg)
(average)
1.7 1.1 0.3 0.03 0.0 0.0
Bioanalyzer
RIN Score (average)
7.1 5.2 Not applicable 2.2 Not applicable Not applicable
Representative
Bioanalyzer Trace
graphic file with name ijmsv19p0098i001.jpg graphic file with name ijmsv19p0098i002.jpg graphic file with name ijmsv19p0098i003.jpg graphic file with name ijmsv19p0098i004.jpg graphic file with name ijmsv19p0098i005.jpg graphic file with name ijmsv19p0098i006.jpg

*Normal rabbit articular cartilage (3 mg per sample) was used for RNA isolation in each method; Method chosen for microarray analysis; UV data available for only one sample.