Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):98–104. doi: 10.7150/ijms.65343

Table 3.

Quantity and quality of RNA isolated from cartilage samples harvested at 8 weeks post microfracture*

Project samples NanoDrop One BioAnalyzer (Pico & Nano chip assay)
Sample ID Treatment 260/280 RNA concentration (ng/µl) RNA yield (µg) RIN Estimated RNA concentration (ng/µl) RNA yield (µg)
1 Membrane 2.0 55.3 1.7 7.0 52.8 1.6
2 scSOX9-A76E 1.9 47.6 1.4 7.1 33 1.0
3 scSOX9-A76E 1.7 63.8 1.9 6.5 35.2 1.1
4 scSOX9 1.8 9.8 0.3 6.9 12.4 0.4
5 Normal 2.0 22.0 0.7 7.6 13.2 0.4
6 scSOX9-A76E 2.0 42.7 1.3 8.3 62.4 1.9
7 Normal 1.9 3.5 0.1 7.5 2.2 0.1
8 Normal 2.0 8.2 0.2 6.8 10.1 0.3
9 scSOX9 2.0 66.4 2.0 7.2 57.6 1.7
10 scSOX9 2.0 87.4 2.6 6.5 140.8 4.2
11 Membrane 2.0 45.7 1.4 6.7 59.2 1.8
12 Membrane 1.9 60.1 1.8 6.7 54.4 1.6

*Data presented in this table were obtained for RNA isolated with Method 1a (Figure 1 and Table 1).

Wet weight of cartilage samples ranged between 1.9 - 2.9 mg.

Treatment: After cartilage defect was created, microfracture was performed and supplemented with collagen membrane (Membrane) alone, or with collagen membrane carrying super-positive changed charged SRY-type high-mobility group box 9 (scSOX9) or a mutant scSOX9-A76E. Normal: normal cartilage was taken from the counter lateral knee. RIN: RNA integrity number.