TABLE 2.
Assay | Analytic evaluation | Clinical evaluation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analytic validation | Measurement in EPI dogs a | Effect of heparinization b | Effect of lipemia, icterus, and/or hemolysis c | Histopathologic reference standard | Clinical reference standard | |
DGGR lipase |
Laboratory: interassay CV <3% and intra‐assay CV ≤14% 69 Linearity: R 2 .98 69 Clinical agreement with Spec cPL k = 0.43‐0.68 69 , 75 ICC = 0.89 50 |
Median 34 U/L (RI: 20‐94 U/L) Lipase within RI in 33/48 dogs 73 |
Significant increases in lipase detected postheparinization 74 | No significant effect 69 | – | |
v‐LIP‐P |
Laboratory: Inter‐ and intra‐assay CV < 5% 77 Clinical agreement with Spec cPL r = .91 79 |
58% of dogs had lipase concentration within lower 20% of RI (≤32 U/L) 78% of dogs had lipase concentration within lower 25% of RI (≤40 U/L) 78 |
– |
Intralipid administration increases v‐LIP‐P activity Naturally occurring hyperlipidemia had a lesser effect on v‐LIP‐P activity 78 Influenced by hemolysis 78 |
– |
Sensitivity: 100% 45 Specificity: 89.5% 45 |
Dogs with EPI should have negligible serum activities of pancreatic lipase.
Heparinization leads to release of lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase.
Lipemia and icterus are commonly seen in dogs with suspected pancreatitis.