TABLE 3.
Path | Effect | SE | t | P | 95% CI |
|
Lower | Upper | |||||
Total effect (c) | –0.457 | 0.114 | –3.998 | < 0.001*** | –0.682 | –0.232 |
Direct effect | –0.302 | 0.122 | –2.467 | 0.014* | –0.542 | –0.061 |
Total indirect effect | –0.156 | 0.052 | − | − | –0.265 | –0.063 |
Model a | ||||||
Indirect effect (X → self-efficacy → Y) | –0.006 | 0.020 | − | − | –0.050 | 0.032 |
Indirect effect (X → coping style → Y) | –0.136 | 0.049 | − | − | –0.236 | –0.046 |
Indirect effect (X → self-efficacy → coping style → Y) | –0.015 | 0.009 | − | − | –0.037 | –0.001 |
Model b | ||||||
Indirect effect (X → coping style → Y) | –0.150 | 0.054 | − | − | –0.263 | –0.053 |
Indirect effect (X → self-efficacy → Y) | –0.002 | 0.011 | − | − | –0.027 | 0.017 |
Indirect effect (X → coping style → self-efficacy → Y) | –0.004 | 0.012 | − | − | –0.029 | 0.021 |
X, psychological flexibility; Y, pediatric vaccine hesitancy; *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.