TABLE 2.
Added therapeutic value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Maximum | Important | Moderate | Poor | Absent | |
Therapeutic need | Maximum | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
Important | 0 | 12 | 14 | 6 | 2 | |
Moderate | 0 | 15 | 20 | 16 | 1 | |
Poor | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
Absent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Therapeutic need | ||||||
n | Maximum | Important | Moderate | Poor | Absent | |
Quality of clinical evidence | High | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Moderate | 4 | 15 | 38 | 4 | 0 | |
Low | 6 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
Very low | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
Added therapeutic value | ||||||
n | Maximum | Important | Moderate | Poor | Absent | |
Quality of clinical evidence | High | 0 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 2 |
Moderate | 1 | 17 | 19 | 20 | 1 | |
Low | 0 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 0 | |
Very low | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Cramer V = 0.24; p = 0.224. Cramer V = 0.25; p = 0.008. Cramer V = 0.20; p = 0.517. Data were summarized as numbers (n). Chi-squared test was used to compute the p-value for Cramer's V.