TABLE 5.
α diversity of cecum and ileum microbial community in different groups1,2.
Item | Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | SEM | P-value |
Cecum | ||||||
Shannon | 3.00 | 3.61 | 3.47 | 3.19 | 0.135 | 0.404 |
Simpson | 0.208 | 0.089 | 0.114 | 0.147 | 0.023 | 0.319 |
ACE | 294.40 | 311.18 | 304.62 | 305.61 | 4.449 | 0.639 |
Chao | 299.04 | 313.05 | 304.77 | 309.10 | 4.604 | 0.766 |
Ileum | ||||||
Shannon | 3.15926 | 4.22804 | 3.84302 | 5.84306 | 0.391 | 0.081 |
Simpson | 0.13528 | 0.1852 | 0.16514 | 0.01094 | 0.043 | 0.508 |
ACE | 460.473b | 667.262b | 735.252a,b | 975.853a | 58.653 | 0.007 |
Chao | 441.658c | 674.64b,c | 740.653a,b | 982.825a | 60.437 | 0.006 |
1Group I (control group), Group II (150 mg/kg NSPases in basal diet), Group III (25 mg/kg Bacillus probiotics in basal diet), Group IV (150 mg/kg NSPases + 25 mg/kg Bacillus probiotics in basal diet).
2Data is the mean of 5 replicates per treatment.
a–cDifferent superscript letters in the same row indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.