Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 20;2005(2):CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2

Lacy 2002.

Methods RCT 
 sample size calculation; 
 preoperative randomisation; 
 conversions analysed as intention to treat.
Participants n = 219 
 Inclusion: Adenocarcinoma above 15cm from the anal verge. 
 Exclusion: intestinal obstruction, adjacent organ infiltration, transverse colon cancer, distant metastasis, past colonic surgery, no consent.
Interventions laparoscopic vs. conventional 
 Location: ascending colon, colonic flexures, descending colon, sigmoid colon, upper rectum. 
 Conversions: adjacent organ infiltration 15. 
 Type of resection: right colon 49 vs. 49, left colon 58 vs. 48, rectal 3 vs. 9, extended resection 1 vs. 2. 
 Tumor stage: UICC I 26 vs. 18, 
 UICC II 42 vs. 48, UICC III 37 vs.36, UICC IV 5 vs. 6.
Outcomes Main study criterium: cancer related survival. 
 Data given for: operative time, 
 duration of ileus, morbidity, hospital stay.
Notes Laparoscopic technique: gas insufflation. 
 Conventional incision: not stated. Anesthesia/Analgesia: not stated. 
 Analgetic drugs: not stated. 
 Evans & Pollock: Design 41, 
 Analysis 14, 
 Presentation 17, 
 Total 72.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate