Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 20;2005(2):CD003145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003145.pub2

Stage 1997.

Methods RCT 
 no sample size calculation; 
 preoperative randomisation; 
 conversions excluded from analysis.
Participants n = 29 
 Inclusion: malignant colonic disease. 
 Exclusion: extensive local tumor growth, low anterior resection, APR. 
 Conversion: extensive tumor growth 3.
Interventions laparoscopic vs. conventional 
 Conversions: extensive tumor growth 3. 
 Tumor location: ascending colon, right colonic flexure, left colonic flexure, descending colon, sigmoid. 
 Type of resection: right colon 7 vs. 7, left colon 8 vs. 8. 
 Tumor stage: Dukes A 3 vs. 4, 
 Dukes B 8 vs. 4, Dukes C 2 vs. 2, 
 Dukes D 2 vs. 4.
Outcomes Main study criterium: not stated. 
 Data given for: operative time, pain, pulmonary function, morbidity, hospital stay.
Notes Laparoscopic technique: gas insufflation. 
 Conventional incision: midline or paramedian. 
 Anesthesia/Analgesia: standardized thoracic epidural + systemic on demand; 
 Analgetic drugs: bupivacaine/morphine for epidural, morphine or ketobemidone i.m. on request. 
 Evans & Pollock: Design 31, Analysis 13, 
 Presentation 15, Total 59.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear