Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 28;24:101535. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101535

Table 3.

Associations between risk subgroups identified using recursive partitioning analysis and excess sedentary behaviour at ages 8–10 years, among 294 QUALITY participants.

Excess SB at 8–10 years of age
OR (95% CI) ORadj‡‡ (95% CI)
Group 1* (n = 93) Reference Reference
Group 2 (n = 123) 9.2 (3.1, 27.0) 10.3 (3.3, 32.1)
Group 3 (n = 32)§ 11.7 (3.4, 40.2) 13.6 (3.7, 50.9)
Group 4 (n = 3) 9.5 (1.8, 51.4) 11.4 (2.0, 68.3)
Group 5 (n = 25)# 14.8 (4.18, 53.4) 11.3 (2.9, 44.3)
Group 6 (n = 11)** 59.3 (11.3, 312.9) 98.2 (16.3, 591.9)

Abbreviations: adj, adjusted; OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval.

*

lowest risk of excess sedentary behaviour.

Group 1 consisted of participants who met moderate to vigorous physical activity guidelines.

Group 2 consisted of participants who did not meet moderate to vigorous physical activity guidelines and engaged in ≤ 2 h/day of screen time on week days.

§

Group 3 consisted of participants who did not meet moderate to vigorous physical activity guidelines, engaged in >2 h/day of screen time on week days, and resided in a high-dwelling density neighbourhood.

Group 4 consisted of participants who did not meet moderate to vigorous physical activity guidelines, engaged in >2 h/day of screen time on week days, resided in a low-dwelling density neighbourhood, and ≥ 4 parks were located in their residential neighbourhood.

#

Group 5 consisted of participants who did not meet moderate to vigorous physical activity guidelines, engaged in >2 h/day of screen time on week days, resided in a low-dwelling density neighbourhood, <4 parks were located in their residential neighbourhood, and with low neighbourhood disadvantage.

**

Group 6 consisted of participants who did not meet moderate to vigorous physical activity guidelines, engaged in >2 h/day of screen time on week days, resided in a low-dwelling density neighbourhood, <4 parks were located in their residential neighbourhood, and with high neighbourhood disadvantage.

‡‡

Adjusted for child’s age, sex (boy/girl), puberty (initiated/not), body mass index percentile, parent’s education (>1 with university degree/no parent with university degree), mother’s body mass index, and father’s body mass index.