ABSTRACT
The upper respiratory tract is the primary site of infection by porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV). In this study, primary porcine respiratory epithelial cells (PRECs) were cultured in an air-liquid interface (ALI) to differentiate into a pseudostratified columnar epithelium, proliferative basal cells, M cells, ciliated cells, and mucus-secreting goblet cells. ALI-PRECs recreates a cell culture environment morphologically and functionally more representative of the epithelial lining of the swine trachea than traditional culture systems. PHEV replicated actively in this environment, inducing cytopathic changes and progressive disruption of the mucociliary apparatus. The innate immunity against PHEV was comparatively evaluated in ALI-PREC cultures and tracheal tissue sections derived from the same cesarean-derived, colostrum-deprived (CDCD) neonatal donor pigs. Increased expression levels of TLR3 and/or TLR7, RIG1, and MyD88 genes were detected in response to infection, resulting in the transcriptional upregulation of IFN-λ1 in both ALI-PREC cultures and tracheal epithelia. IFN-λ1 triggered the upregulation of the transcription factor STAT1, which in turn induced the expression of the antiviral IFN-stimulated genes OAS1 and Mx1. No significant modulation of the major proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) was detected in response to PHEV infection. However, a significant upregulation of different chemokines was observed in ALI-PREC cultures (CCL2, CCL5, CXCL8, and CXCL10) and tracheal epithelium (CXCL8 and CXCL10). This study shed light on the molecular mechanisms driving the innate immune response to PHEV at the airway epithelium, underscoring the important role of respiratory epithelial cells in the maintenance of respiratory homeostasis and on the initiation, resolution, and outcome of the infectious process.
IMPORTANCE The neurotropic betacoronavirus porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV) primarily infects and replicates in the swine upper respiratory tract, causing vomiting and wasting disease and/or encephalomyelitis in suckling pigs. This study investigated the modulation of key early innate immune genes at the respiratory epithelia in vivo, on tracheal tissue sections from experimentally infected pigs, and in vitro, on air-liquid interface porcine respiratory cell cultures. The results from the study underscore the important role of respiratory epithelial cells in maintaining respiratory homeostasis and on the initiation, resolution, and outcome of the PHEV infectious process.
KEYWORDS: ALI-REC, betacoronavirus, chemokines, cytokines, coronavirus, gene expression, IFN-λ1, IL-8, innate response, PHEV, RIG, TLR
INTRODUCTION
Porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV) is an enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) virus that belongs to the order Nidovirales, family Coronaviridae, subfamily Orthocoronavirinae, genus Betacoronavirus, and subgenus Embecovirus (1). PHEV is related to murine hepatitis virus (MHV), bovine coronavirus (BCoV), and human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43) through a common ancestor (2). However, it is the only known Betacoronavirus (species Betacoronavirus 1) affecting pigs, with no evidence of infection in other species, including humans. PHEV is the causative agent of vomiting and wasting disease (VWD) and/or encephalomyelitis in suckling pigs (3–5). Recent in vivo infection studies from our group further demonstrated that PHEV-affected regions were characterized by a variable degree of lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration (6). However, the mechanisms causing this inflammatory infiltration are not completely understood.
Different experimental studies (6–10) and field outbreak investigations (4, 10, 11) described PHEV-associated respiratory signs early after infection. More recently, PHEV has been associated with respiratory disease in pigs (11). Actually, the virus was first isolated in 1970 from the nasal cavity of apparently healthy pigs during a routine diagnostic survey (8), and viral antigens were detected inside the cytoplasm of the epithelial cells lining nasal mucosa, bronchi, and bronchioles (12). Our group further demonstrated that, under in vivo and ex vivo experimental conditions, PHEV (67N strain) replicates in the upper respiratory tract epithelium and tonsil of cesarean-derived, colostrum-deprived (CDCD) neonatal pigs (6). Therefore, as for many other pathogens with respiratory tropism, respiratory epithelial cells could play a vital role in initiating and shaping the crucial defensive immunological processes during PHEV infections.
Besides the defensive role of the respiratory epithelium as a passive physical (cilia) and chemical barrier (mucins) (13, 14), it secretes a broad spectrum of molecules, including inflammatory and chemotactic mediators and antimicrobial substances (15, 16). As part of the upper respiratory tract, tracheal epithelia express a range of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), nucleotide-binding and oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG) I-like receptors (RLRs), membrane C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), and DNA receptors, which recognize and distinguish microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) from common flora and stimulate intracellular signaling pathways (17, 18). This signaling ultimately leads to the transcriptional upregulation of an antimicrobial and inflammatory response that can be time, location, and cell type dependent. Hence, it is particularly important to investigate PHEV infection and its immunopathogenesis in the upper respiratory tract, a primary site of PHEV infection.
In response to the need for alternative yet reliable approaches to traditional cell culture and animal infection models, organotypic airway cultures constitute an increasingly accepted paradigm shift for infection disease investigations across different animal species, including humans, cattle, sheep, mice, horses, cats, dogs, and pigs (19–27). In a previous study, we demonstrated that PHEV infects, replicates in, and induces cytopathic changes in porcine tracheal epithelial cells (PRECs) cultured in an air-liquid interface (ALI) (10). This model allows primary epithelial cells to differentiate into the pseudostratified epithelium resembling the epithelial lining of the tracheal region of the respiratory tract, recreating a physiological environment more representative of that in vivo than the traditional submerged culture systems. In addition, coculturing other immune cells in ALI cultures will lead to further evaluation of cell-cell and cell-virus interactions during infection. However, the mechanisms driving the modulation of the innate antiviral responses to PHEV are completely unknown. Therefore, the present study investigated key signaling mediators of the innate immune response against PHEV at the epithelial lining of the porcine respiratory tract, comparing both ALI-PREC cultures and tracheal tissue sections derived from CDCD neonatal pigs.
RESULTS
Microscopic relief contrast and ultrastructural analysis.
Typically, pig tracheal sections yielded 300 to 500 million cells, and when seeded at a density of ∼20,000 cells/mm2 (Fig. 1A), approximately 25 to 30% confluence was achieved on day 1. By day 18, ALI-PRECs on transwells were completely confluent with no visible medium seepage; however, a shiny glaze that resembled mucus was observed on the surface of the cells growing on transwells under the microscope. Moreover, around the periphery of the transwell, some epithelial cells expressed cilia and started showing ciliary movement. The number of cilia continued to increase, and by day 27, cilium-expressing cells were at least 50% confluent (Fig. 1B and see Movie S1 in the supplemental material).
Paraffin-embedded cross sections prepared from 27-day-old ALI-PREC cultures on transwell inserts stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) evidenced the presence of multilayered pseudostratified epithelial cells showing both ciliated and nonciliated regions (Fig. 1C). Transmitted electron microscopy (TEM) of these sections further confirmed the presence of ciliated cells (Fig. 1D) expressing cilium axoneme with abundant mitochondrion activity (Fig. 1E). The ultrastructural analysis also confirmed the presence of ciliated cells (Fig. 1E), mucin-secreting goblet cells (Fig. 1F), and other nonciliated cells such as brush cells, basal cells, and cells with electron-dense secretory granules, with the presence of tight junctions and desmosomes (Fig. 1D).
Cellular characterization: immunocytochemistry and gene expression.
ALI-PRECs on transwells stained positive for periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain (Fig. 2A), which recognizes neutral mucins and alcian blue (Fig. 2B), which recognizes acidic sulfated mucosubstances, hyaluronic acid, or sialomucins. In addition, these cell cultures stained positive for tight junction marker occludin (Fig. 2C), cell proliferation marker Ki67 (Fig. 2D), epithelial cell marker pancytokeratin (Fig. 2E), and M-cell marker microfold antibody (Fig. 2I). However, the distribution of these markers was not uniform across the transwell. Gene expression studies in ALI-PRECs further confirmed the presence of proliferating cells (PCNA), goblet cells (MUCIN2), neuroendocrine cells (CHGA), stem cells (LGR5), brush cells (SPIB isoform 1), microfold cells (GP2), and basal cells (KRT5), similar to the porcine trachea (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Gene | NCBI accession no. | Specificity | ALI-PRECs | Trachea |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCNA | NM_001291925.1 | Proliferating cells | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
MUCIN2 | XM_021082584.1 | Goblet cells | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
CHGA | NM_001164005.2 | Neuroendocrine cells | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
LGR5 | XM_021090898.1 | Stem cells | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
SPIB isoform 1 | XM_003127365.3 | Brush cells | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
GP2 | XM_003124571.4 | Microfold cells | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
KRT5 | XM_003126173.4 | Basal cells | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
DPP4/CD26 | NM_214257.1 | Coronavirus receptors | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
APN/ANPEP | NM_214277.1 | Coronavirus receptors | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
ACE2 | NM_001123070.1 | Coronavirus receptors | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
CEACAM1/CD66a | XM_021094420.1 | Coronavirus receptors | + (2/2) | + (2/2) |
The presence and absence of the receptors are represented by + and −, respectively. Values in parentheses were the number of biological samples tested positive per total tested.
Viral receptor distribution.
ALI-PRECs were stained for common viral protein coronavirus receptors, including sialic acids, ACE2, CEACAM1, DPP4, and APN. The expression of sialic acids on ALI-PRECs was evidenced by the relative abundance of Sambucus nigra lectin (SNA) and Maackia amurensis II lectin (MAL II), specific for α-2,6-linked sialic acids and α-2,3-linked sialic acids, respectively. However, the expression of α-2,6-linked sialic acids (Fig. 2G and H) was dominant compared to α-2,3-linked sialic acid receptors in ALI-PRECs (Fig. 2F and H). Although ACE2 (Fig. 2J), CEACAM1 (Fig. 2K), DPP4 (Fig. 2L), and APN (Fig. 2M) receptors were diffusely expressed (stained) on the surface of ALI-PRECs, further transcriptional analysis confirmed the presence of ACE2, CEACAM1, DPP4, and APN in ALI-PRECs as in their natural counterpart, i.e., tracheal epithelia in vivo (Table 1).
PHEV replicates and disrupts ALI-PREC cultures.
ALI-PRECs appeared normal and showed active ciliary movement for up to 24 h postinoculation (hpi) in both mock- (Fig. 3A) and PHEV-inoculated (Fig. 3B) cultures. The virus-inoculated cells started showing cytopathic changes around 36 hpi (Fig. 3C) and increased over 48 hpi (Fig. 3D) compared to mock-inoculated cells (Movies S1 and S2). Cytopathic effects (CPE) included ciliary destruction (Movie S2), cytoplasmic stranding, vacuolation, rounding of cells, clusters of rounded cells, cell shrinkage, and detachment of cells exposing the transwell membrane of PHEV-inoculated ALI-PRECs (Fig. 3F). PHEV-affected areas presented a “leathery or crusty” appearance compared to unaffected areas in ALI-PRECs (Fig. 3C and D). Once the integrity of ALI-PRECs was breached, the virus started to shed into the bottom subnatants of the plate well medium between 6 and 48 hpi, as evidenced by the RT-qPCR results (Fig. 3E).
Expression profile of innate immune genes in PHEV-infected ALI-PRECs.
Following transcriptional analysis of 45 target genes, a significant increase in the expression of PRR TLR3, melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), and RIG1 genes was observed in PHEV-inoculated ALI-PREC cultures at 36 hpi (Fig. 4). Even though there was an increased expression of intracellular PRRs such as NLRP3 and NOD2, their expression was variable and not statistically significant (data not shown). The expression levels of the myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) gene, a key mediator of the inflammatory pathway, were punctually upregulated at 36 hpi in ALI-PRECs, while the expression levels of the cell death mediator receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) gene were significantly upregulated by 48 hpi (Fig. 4). Interestingly, there were no significant differences in the expression levels of both type 1 (IFNα1 and IFNβ1) and type 2 (IFNγ) interferon genes, but the expression levels of the type 3 (IFNλ1) interferon gene were significantly upregulated at 24 hpi in ALI-PRECs (Fig. 4). The interferon stimulatory genes myxovirus resistance gene 1 (Mx1) and 2-5-oligoadenylate synthetase 1 (OAS1) were upregulated considerably by 36 hpi. Out of the four Jak-STAT signaling molecules (suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 [SOCS1], SOCS3, STAT1, and STAT4) analyzed in this study, only the STAT1 gene was significantly upregulated (36 to 48 hpi) in ALI-PRECs following infection with PHEV. Consistent with this pattern, chemokine CCL2, CCL5, and CXCL10 genes were also upregulated at 36 and 48 hpi, while the expression of CXCL8/IL8 genes was >2-fold significantly higher at 6 hpi than at the subsequent time points evaluated (Fig. 4). Interestingly, the three proinflammatory cytokine genes IL1β, IL6, and TNFα were poorly expressed through the course of the study, with no significant differences between PHEV- and mock-inoculated ALI-PRECs (data not shown). The expression levels of TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon beta (TRIF) and TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF) genes were not significant throughout the study. Moreover, although there was differential regulation of other innate immune response-related genes such as MHC1, MHC2, NF p105, NF p50, NFkB2, interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and IRF7, AP1, and EGFR in PHEV- versus mock-inoculated ALI-PRECs, the expression levels were variable across replicates and, therefore, not statistically significant (data not presented).
Expression profile of innate immune genes in tracheal tissues from PHEV-infected pigs.
In a previous study (6), we reported the detection of significant PHEV RNA levels in tracheal tissues collected from pigs experimentally inoculated with PHEV and necropsied on day postinfection (dpi) 5. As a continuation, in the present study, we performed transcriptome analysis (45 target genes) of these tracheal tissues in comparison to their corresponding mock-inoculated pigs as the negative control. Note that PREC cultures derived from trachea tissue sections of the mock-inoculated control pigs.
In response to PHEV infection, there was more than a 1-fold increase in the expression of TLR7, TRAF6, MHC1, IL8, CXCL10, IFNα1, IFNβ1, IFNγ, IFNλ1, Mx1, and STAT1 genes, with a P value of <0.05 (Fig. 5). Even in the tracheal tissue, all proinflammatory cytokine genes (IL1β, IL6, and TNFα) along with other innate immune genes were either poorly expressed or variable between two pigs, with no significant difference between PHEV- and mock-inoculated ALI-PRECs (data not shown).
Increased levels of IL-8 in the subnatants of ALI-PRECs in response to PHEV infection.
After inoculating ALI-PRECs with PHEV and mock medium, the bottom subnatants in the plate well were collected at 6, 24, 36, and 48 hpi and were tested for IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL1Ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) using a 13-plex Luminex assay. Out of 13 analytes, the minimum detectable concentrations (MinDC; ng/ml) of 12 (gamma interferon [IFN-γ], IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, TNF-α, and GM-CSF) analytes were below the range of detection. However, the levels of IL-8 (MinDC, 0.005) increased over time, being significantly (P value < 0.005) higher in ALI-PRECs inoculated with PHEV than in mock-inoculated ALI-PRECs (Fig. 6).
DISCUSSION
ALI-PRECs are morphologically and functionally similar to the natural epithelial lining of the tracheal region of the porcine respiratory tract.
Together with other major upper respiratory tract organs, the tracheal epithelium constitutes a barrier between the external environment and the lung. However, it does not just provide a mechanical barrier but also primes the initiation, persistence, and resolution of airway mucosal innate immune responses (28). Although ALI-PREC cultures were first reported in 2000 (71), early attempts were unable to determine multilayered differentiated columnar epithelium containing goblet cells. The ALI-PREC culture system developed and characterized in this study exhibited enough complexity to mimic the morphology and physiology of the pseudostratified airway epithelial lining of the tracheal region of the porcine respiratory tract. Ultrastructural analysis by transmitted electron microscopy on differentiated ALI-PRECs (∼27 days of culture) showed a complex pseudostratified columnar epithelium constituted by ciliated and nonciliated airway epithelial cells (i.e., pluripotent proliferative basal cells, M cells, ciliated cells, and mucus-secreting goblet cells), tight junctions, and desmosomes between them (30, 31). Thereby, the ALI-PRECs circumvent the need to use biocontainment animal facilities, reducing the reliance upon the use of tissues from multiple donor animals, or to establish large stocks of primary cells for individual and highly reproducible sets of experiments.
Under ALI conditions, epithelial cells were endowed with beating cilia that, together with the protective mucus layer created by goblet cells, and an airway surface liquid layer (Fig. 2G and N; see also Movie S1 in the supplemental material), mimic in vivo the mucociliary clearance apparatus, which is an essential partner of the mucosal immune system (32–36). The epithelial surfaces of ALI-PRECs also expressed different host viral receptors such as sialic acids (37), ACE2 (38), CEACAM1 (39), DPP4 (40), and APN (41), widely used by influenza viruses and coronaviruses. Consequently, ALI cell cultures support viral infections, and they have been used to study host-virus interactions (6, 19–23).
In a previous study, we demonstrated that PHEV (67N strain) infects and replicates in ALI-PRECs derived from the tracheal region of the pig respiratory tract (6). However, the specific host receptor involved in PHEV cell binding and entry and essential steps in establishing viral infections is yet to be determined. Microscopic observations from this and our previous study (6) showed that PHEV causes cytopathic changes and disruption of the ciliated columnar epithelium, i.e., a decrease in the number of cilium-expressing cells and a dampening effect on ciliary movement from 6 to 48 hpi (Movies S1 and S2).
ALI-PRECs are excellent ex vivo models to study molecular immune responses toward PHEV infection.
Previous studies reported the utility of ALI-PREC cultures as infection model for other viruses including porcine respiratory coronavirus (42) and influenza A virus (20, 43). However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to report comparative innate immune responses toward betacoronavirus PHEV in vivo and in vitro. The current study aimed to investigate the differential gene modulation of PRRs and downstream innate immunity mediators in the upper respiratory tract (i.e., trachea) in response to PHEV infection both in vivo (trachea sections from pigs) and in vitro (ALI-PREC cultures).
Like other innate immune cells, epithelial cells distinguish pathogens by using an array of PRRs such as TLRs, RLRs, and NLRs (44, 45). Thus, the modulation of key signaling mediators of the innate immunity was evaluated in ALI-PREC cultures inoculated with PHEV 67N over the course of 48 h. Regardless, the same innate immune mediators were also evaluated in tracheal tissue sections collected at necropsy (5 dpi) from 10-day-old CDCD pigs inoculated with the same strain and dose used for ALI-PRECs.
The array of gene expression data presented here shows a consistent upregulation of TLR3 and/or TLR7 genes in vivo (trachea sections from in vivo) and in vitro (ALI-PREC cultures) in response to infection, indicating that PHEV RNA might be recognized by these two key PRR upstream innate immune mediators. TLR7 and TLR3 function as an innate host sensor of viral ssRNA and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), respectively (46), while MyD88 and TRIF are the major adapters that bind to the intracellular domain of TLR to activate the proinflammatory response (47). MyD88 is the canonical adapter for inflammatory signaling pathways downstream of all TLRs except TLR3, which directly recruits the adapter TRIF (47). Generally, MyD88 and TRIF cause nuclear translocation of the transcriptional factor NF-κB, basic leucine zipper family members, and members of the interferon regulatory factor family (IRF3 and IRF7) that ultimately leads to the production of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α), which are essential for the antiviral response (48, 49). In the present study, MyD88 but not TRIF was upregulated in response to PHEV infection in ALI-PRECs. Moreover, the gene expression levels of cytoplasmic RLRs RIG-I, recognizing RNA with 5′ triphosphates, and MDA5, which recognizes long and stable dsRNA (50), were upregulated only in ALI-PREC cultures infected with PHEV but not in mock-inoculated control cultures.
Together, the enhanced mRNA levels of TLR7, RIG1, and MyD88 signal transduction pathways induced the transcriptional upregulation of type I IFNα1/β1 genes only in pig tracheal epithelia and of IFNλ1 in both the tracheal epithelia and ALI-PRECs. These findings in ALI-PRECs are further supported by undetectable levels of secretory levels of IFN-α in the subnatants. While most nucleated cells respond to type I IFN, it has been reported that type III IFN-λ induces IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) expression and efficiently protects from a viral infection of epithelial cells at the intestinal and respiratory tract in vivo (51, 52). IFNs induce an autocrine signaling cascade that triggers phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STATs) (53). In this study, the expression of the STAT1 gene was consistently upregulated in both the tracheal epithelia and ALI-PREC cultures. This transcription factor induces the expression of ISGs involved in resistance to viral infections (54, 55). Specifically, we detected significant expression levels of the ISG OAS1, which forms part of the OAS/RNase L system (56–58). Like its homologous OAS2 and OAS3, the OAS1 gene encodes an oligoadenylate synthetase that produces short-chain poly(A)s that activate an RNase L, leading to viral dsRNA degradation, and activate other antiviral cell mechanisms beyond the scope of the present study (59). Similarly, an increased expression of the ISG class Mx1 was observed and identified initially as factors of resistance to lethal influenza A virus infections in mice (60).
Of note, mRNA levels of neither NF-κB (NF p105, NF p50, and NFkB2) nor any of the major proinflammatory cytokines (IL1β, IL6, and TNFα) were differentially regulated in response to PHEV infection. Likewise, a recent study showed that PHEV hampers IFN-β production via inactivation of IRF3 in mouse macrophage cell lines (61), which could suggest an immune evasion tactic of PHEV to subside proinflammatory and type I IFN signaling.
In addition, chemokines are critical for epithelial homeostasis and responses to infections (62, 63). Several chemokine promoters regulating, e.g., CCL2, CCL5, and CXCL10, contain binding sites for STAT1 and/or ISGF3, and their stimulation by type III IFNs enhances secretion of these chemokines. Interestingly, a significant upregulation of CCL2 and CCL5 genes in ALI-PRECs, and of CXCL8 and CXCL10 genes in both ALI-PRECs and pig trachea sections, was detected in response to PHEV infection. Specifically, the upregulation of IFNλ1 and STAT1 genes might play a role in the expression of the chemokines observed in this study. It is well known that the activation of chemokines during infection mediates immune cell trafficking (cellular defense) to the site of infection, and it is a classic response in the respiratory epithelium, having a critical impact on pathogenesis and virus replication and clearance (64–67). In the present study, it was particularly interesting that the upregulation of the CXCL8/IL8 gene accompanied an increase in the secretory levels of IL-8 in subnatants of ALI-PREC cultures infected with PHEV. This is in line with our previous studies reporting increasing systemic levels of IL-8 in pigs experimentally inoculated with PHEV 67N, leading to the recruitment and subsequent infiltration of T lymphocytes and macrophages (6, 68). Although beyond the scope of this paper, the link between local innate and adaptive immunity will be further investigated using cocultures of ALI-PRECs and immune cells.
Conclusion.
In summary, the results from this study shed light on the molecular mechanisms driving the innate immune response of the airway epithelium against PHEV and underscore the important role of respiratory epithelial cells in the maintenance of respiratory homeostasis and on the initiation, resolution, and outcome of the infectious process. The ALI-PREC culture established in this study constitutes an excellent ex vivo infection model alternative to animal studies, which can be easily extrapolated to different animal species and pathogens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus in vitro culture and propagation.
PHEV 67N, or “Mengeling strain,” obtained from the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL; United States Department of Agriculture [USDA], Ames, IA, USA) was propagated in swine kidney primary (SKP) cells (NVSL) as previously described (10). In brief, SKP cells were maintained in growth medium 1 (GM 1) (minimum essential medium with Earle’s medium [EMEM] [Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA] with 0.5% lactalbumin enzymatic hydrolysate [Millipore-Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA] supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS; ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA], 0.15% sodium bicarbonate [Millipore-Sigma], 1% l-glutamine [Thermo Fisher Scientific], 1% sodium pyruvate [Thermo Fisher Scientific], 3 μg/ml amphotericin B [AmpB; Thermo Fisher Scientific], 25 μg/ml kanamycin [Thermo Fisher Scientific], and 75 μg/ml of gentamicin [Thermo Fisher Scientific]), at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were inoculated with 2 ml of antibiotic-trypsin-Versene (ATV) trypsin once 80% confluence was achieved in a 75-cm2 tissue culture flask (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated for 5 min at 37°C with 5% CO2. Subsequently, 5 ml of virus diluted 1:10 in infection medium for SKP cells (GM 1 without FBS) was added and incubated for 4 days at 37°C with 5% CO2. The virus was harvested and titrated by hemagglutination assay and stored at −80°C.
Experimental inoculation of CDCD neonatal pigs.
The experimental protocol for the animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC log no. 12-17-8658-S; approval date, 3 January 2018) of Iowa State University (ISU). The animal study was fully described in a previous study (10). Briefly, 7-day-old CDCD piglets (Yorkshire × Large White crossbred) were inoculated with 5 ml of virus inoculum (0.5 ml of PHEV 67N [1:128 hemagglutinin {HA}] in 4.5 ml of EMEM [Thermo Fisher Scientific]) oronasally or mock inoculated (control group) with 5 ml of EMEM oronasally.
Tissue collection.
Tissues from the tracheal region of the respiratory tract, i.e., from below the larynx to the bronchial bifurcation (approximately 6 to 8 in.), were aseptically collected from piglets immediately after necropsy. Some samples from both PHEV-inoculated and control animals were dissected and fixed in 10% buffered neutral formalin or snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for gene expression analysis. In addition, tracheal sections of healthy piglets within the negative-control group were collected in Dulbecco’s minimum essential/Ham’s F-12 medium with GlutaMAX (DMEM/F-12) (Thermo Fisher Scientific), supplemented with 100 IU/ml of penicillin/100 μg/ml of streptomycin (Pen-Strep) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1.25 μg/ml of amphotericin B (AmpB) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for isolation and subculture of PRECs.
Culture of primary porcine respiratory epithelial cells at an air-liquid interface.
Isolation and culture of PRECs were performed as previously described (6, 21). Tracheal samples were washed and incubated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with Pen-Strep to remove any blood clots. Then, samples were incubated at 4°C for 48 h in digestion medium (calcium- and magnesium-free minimum essential medium [MEM; in-house]), supplemented with 1.4 mg/ml pronase (Millipore-Sigma), 0.1 mg/ml DNase (Millipore-Sigma), and 100 μg/ml Primocin (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA). Tissue digestion was neutralized using 10% heat-inactivated EqualFetal FBS (Atlas Biologicals, Fort Collins, CO, USA). The tissue digest containing cells was passed through a 40-μm cell strainer, washed, pelleted, and resuspended in DMEM/F-12. The cells collected were either seeded directly using respective growth medium or frozen in LHC basal medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 30% FBS and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Millipore-Sigma). These primary cells were not subjected to further subculturing.
Isolated PRECs were seeded at a density of ∼20,000 cells/mm2 on 24-well ThinCert cell culture inserts or “transwell inserts” (Greiner Bio-One North America Inc., Monroe, NC, USA) previously coated with collagen from the human placenta—Bornstein and Traub type IV (Millipore-Sigma). For the first 24 h, cells were grown in growth medium 2 (GM 2) containing DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1× MEM nonessential amino acids, Pen-Strep, and AmpB at 37°C and 5% CO2. After 24 h, GM 2 was removed from plate well and transwell inserts. Subsequently, growth medium 3 (GM 3) containing DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 1,400 nM hydrocortisone (Acros Organics, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA), 2,700 nM epinephrine (Acros Organics), 100 nM retinoic acid (Acros Organics), 9.7 nM 3,3′,5-triiodo-l-thyronine (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), 0.5 ng/ml murine epidermal growth factor (EGF) (PeproTech US, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), 1× insulin-selenium-transferrin (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1× HEPES (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 2% Ultroser-G (Pall France, Cergy, France), Pen-Strep, and AmpB was used to replace only medium in the plate well. GM 3 was replaced every 2 to 3 days until PRECs were completely differentiated into ALI-PRECs. On day 18 postseeding, PRECs on transwells were completely confluent with no visible medium seepage, and a shiny glaze that resembled mucus was noticed on top of all the cultures. Cilium cell development and differentiation continued through days 27 to 30. Upon complete differentiation, ALI-PRECs were then used for PHEV infection studies or further characterization. Micrographs were captured using relief contrast settings of an Olympus CKX4 microscope (Olympus Corp., Center Valley, PA, USA), an Infinity 2 camera, and Infinity Analyze imaging software (ver. 6.5.5; Lumenera Corp., Ottawa, ON, Canada).
Cellular characterization of ALI-PRECs.
Differentiated and confluent ALI-PRECs on transwell inserts were fixed with 1:1 acetone-methanol (intracellular staining) or 4% paraformaldehyde and carefully embedded in paraffin. Cross sections of paraffin-embedded ALI-PRECs on transwell inserts were used for various staining procedures described here. Micrographs were captured using relief contrast settings of an Olympus CKX4 microscope, an Infinity 2 camera, and Infinity Analyze imaging software (version 6.5.5; Lumenera Corp., Ottawa, ON, Canada).
Mucin staining.
Neutral and acidic mucins on ALI-PRECs were analyzed using an alcian blue and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain. For alcian blue staining, deparaffinized and hydrated ALI-PREC sections were treated with 3% acetic acid for 3 min, followed by incubation with alcian blue (pH 2.5) for 30 min. The sections were counterstained with nuclear fast red for 5 min. For PAS staining, sections were treated with 1% periodic acid for 10 min, followed by incubation with Schiff’s reagent for 15 min. The sections were counterstained with fast green for 1 min. Following staining, dehydrated sections were cleared in Histo-Clear II (Electron Microscopy Sciences [EMS], Hatfield, PA, USA) and mounted in Tissue-Tek Glas mounting medium (Sakura Finetek U.S.A., Inc., Torrance, CA, USA).
Lectin cytochemistry.
ALI-PRECs were characterized for sialic acids using a lectin cytochemistry assay previously described (37). In brief, cross sections of ALI-PRECs on transwell inserts and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde were presoaked in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and blocked using a biotin-streptavidin blocking kit (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with Sambucus nigra lectin (SNA), which binds preferentially to α-2,6-linked sialic acids, and Maackia amurensis II lectin (MAL II), binding to α-2,3-linked sialic acids, both at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml. Subsequently, the cells were incubated with 2 μg/ml streptavidin-Dy650 conjugate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 h at room temperature and counterstained with NucBlue fixed-cell ReadyProbes reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Immunocytochemistry.
Immunocytochemistry was performed for the detection of various cell markers of interest using commercially available antibodies {i.e., tight junction marker occludin [sc-133256; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA], cell proliferation marker Ki67 [sc-23900; Santa Cruz Biotechnology], human ACE2 [amino acids 631 to 805; sc-390851; Santa Cruz Biotechnology], human CEACAM1/CD66a [amino acids 391 to 526; sc-166453; Santa Cruz Biotechnology], DPP4/CD26 [CACT114A-BOV2078; The Washington State University Monoclonal Antibody Center, Pullman, WA, USA], human APN/CD13 receptors [amino acids 668 to 967; sc-166105; Santa Cruz Biotechnology], epithelial cell marker pancytokeratin [MCA1907T; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA], microfold [M] antibody [clone NKM 16-2-4 specifically binds (1,2)-fucose-containing carbohydrate moieties; 130-096-148; Miltenyi Biotec Inc., Auburn, CA, USA]}. In this study, the ImmPRESS VR anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) polymer detection kit (MP-6402-15; Vector Laboratories) was used as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, ALI-PREC sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with the respective primary mouse monoclonal antibodies followed by 2 h of incubation with the following secondary antibodies. A horse-raised anti-mouse IgG polymer labeled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Vector Laboratories) was used for chromogenic stains. Next, cells were incubated in 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) HRP substrate for 5 min and counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). For fluorogenic detection, a goat-raised anti-mouse secondary antibody labeled with Alexa 647 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) was used and counterstained with NucBlue fixed cell ReadyProbes reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Transmitted electron microscopy.
Transwell membranes carrying differentiated ALI-PRECs were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde and 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2, for 48 h at 4°C and then cut into small 2-mm2 squares. Samples were washed in cacodylate buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) three times (10 min each) and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were washed with deionized water three times (15 min each) and en bloc stained using 2% uranyl acetate in distilled water for 1 h. Samples were washed in distilled water for 10 min and dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (25, 50, 70, 85, 95, and 100%) for 1 h for each step. Samples were further dehydrated with three changes of pure acetone (15 min each) and infiltrated with EmBed 812 formula (hard) for Epon epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences) with graded ratios of resin to acetone until thoroughly infiltrated with pure epoxy resin (3:1, 1:1, 1:3, and pure) for 6 to 12 h per step. Samples were placed into Beem capsule lids and were polymerized at 70°C for 48 h. Thick sections (1.5 μm) were made using a Leica UC6 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) and stained with EMS epoxy stain (a blend of toluidine blue-O and basic fuchsin) to identify areas of interest for transmitted electron microscopy (TEM). Thin sections were made at 50 nm and collected onto single-slot carbon film grids. TEM images were collected using a 200-kV JEOL JSM 2100 scanning transmission electron microscope (Japan Electron Optics Laboratories, Peabody, MA, USA) with a Gatan One View 4K camera (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA).
PHEV infection of ALI-PREC cultures.
Completely differentiated ALI-PREC cultures were inoculated with 250 μl of a 1:1 dilution of PHEV 67N (1:128 HA titer) and infection medium for ALI-PRECs containing DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 2% Ultroser G, 1× MEM nonessential amino acids, 1× HEPES, Pen-Strep, and 2 μg/ml N-tosyl-l-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin (Millipore-Sigma) or mock inoculated with infection medium and incubated for 6 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Then, the inoculum was removed, the cell cultures were washed once with DMEM/F-12, fresh infection medium was added into the plate wells, and plates were incubated for 24, 36, and 48 h postinoculation (hpi) at 37°C with 5% CO2. ALI-PREC cultures were monitored daily under the microscope for the presence of cytopathic changes, and subnatants were collected at different time points over the course of the infection for assessment of virus replication.
PHEV RT-qPCR.
Viral RNA extractions were performed using the E.Z.N.A. viral RNA kit (Omega Bio-tek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) and vacuum manifold (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) method following the manufacturer’s instructions. A quantitative PHEV N-gene-based RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) developed by Tetracore (Tetracore, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) and ISU (68) was used to confirm and quantify PHEV infection in vivo (CDCD pigs) and ex vivo (ALI-PREC cultures). Each RT-qPCR mixture (25-μl final reaction volume) was set up by combining 19 μl of PHEV RT-qPCR master mix and 1 μl of the enzyme blend (reverse transcriptase and RNase inhibitor). An internal control (IC) was used as an extraction control, with 6 μl of the IC added to the lysis buffer. Then, 5 μl of the extracted sample RNA with IC was added to Master Mix. All RT-qPCRs were performed in duplicate, with a negative extraction control (NEC), positive extraction control (PEC), and a “no-template” control (NTC) included in each run. RT-qPCRs were run on a Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen) under cycling conditions of 48°C for 15 min and 95°C for 2 min for holding and 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 s for denaturation and 60°C for 40 s for amplification. The RT-qPCR results were analyzed using Rotor-Gene Q Pure Detection software (v 2.3.1). Samples with a threshold cycle (CT) above 40 were considered negative.
Total RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and transcriptional analysis.
For immunological characterization, total RNA was isolated from cells or snap-frozen tissues. Cells were lysed with TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific), while snap-frozen swine tissues were homogenized in TRIzol reagent using 2.8-mm ceramic beads (Omni). After performing the chloroform phase separation, total RNA was extracted from all samples using a commercially available RNeasy Plus minikit (Qiagen), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Eluted RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop One Microvolume UV-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples with an A260/280 between 1.96 and 2.05 were used for reverse transcription using the qScript XLT cDNA SuperMix kit (Quantabio, Beverly, MA, USA).
This study involved transcriptional analysis of 45 target genes (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), including seven endogenous controls (ACTB, B2M, EIF3K, GAPDH, PPIA, RPL10, and PCNA) in both ALI-PRECs and trachea from experimentally infected pigs. The genes related to PRRs and their downstream mediators, antigen-presenting molecules, transcriptional regulators, mediators of inflammation and cell death, classical antiviral genes, interferon stimulatory genes, proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines were analyzed.
All qPCRs were performed using 1× PowerUp SYBR green master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 500 nM swine-specific primers (Table S1; Millipore-Sigma), and 1.5 ng (cells) and 20 ng (tissues) of total RNA converted to cDNA. For 96-well format, the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast real-time system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and for high-throughput format, the Wafergen SmartChip real-time PCR system (TaKaRa Bio USA, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) were used. Each run of the SmartChip real-time PCR system can perform 5,184 real-time PCRs with a volume of 100 ml each, and they were filled using the SmartChip multisample nanodispenser. Quality assurance/quality control checks were performed according to a standard protocol provided by Wafergen Biosystems (service provider RTSF, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA). The cycling conditions used were 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 2 min of holding and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s for denaturation and 60°C for 1 min for amplification; final melting curve analysis was performed at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 95°C for 15 s. All qPCRs were performed in duplicate, and no-template controls (NTCs) were included in each plate/chip.
Finally, qPCR results were analyzed either using 7500 software v2.3 (Applied Biosystems) or SmartChip qPCR software v 2.8.6.1 (TaKaRa Bio USA, Inc.) and exported to Microsoft Excel. Amplification efficiencies beyond the range (1.5 to 2.2) and samples with multiple melting peaks and above a CT value of 40 were discarded. CT values were subsequently analyzed on qBase+ gene expression analysis software (Bio Gazelle, Zwijnaarde, Belgium), which calculates the stability of endogenous control genes and provides a value called M-value. Out of seven endogenous control genes in both PHEV-treated and mock-treated cells, three genes (EIF3K, PPIA, and RPL10) were identified as the best endogenous controls based on their low M-value. Hence, gene expression data were normalized using the geometric mean of these three genes (69). Relative quantitation analysis was performed using the ΔΔCT method as described previously (70).
Multiplex porcine cytokine and chemokine immunoassay.
Using the bottom (plate well) subnatants collected from ALI-PRECs inoculated with PHEV or culture medium (negative control), at 6, 24, 36, and 48 hpi, a porcine cytokine and chemokine 13-plex Luminex assay, including IFN-γ, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-18, TNF-α, and GM-CSF (Milliplex MAP porcine cytokine/chemokine magnetic bead panel; Millipore-Sigma), was performed following manufacturer’s instructions (i.e., using overnight protocol). The 96-well plates were analyzed using a Bio-Plex 200 system operated by the Bio-Plex Manager software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The mean fluorescence intensity data of each sample were subtracted from the blank wells, and the concentration of each cytokine was calculated from the standard curve (5-parametric logistic) generated from the kits’ internal standards and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).
Data analysis.
Tracheal tissue sections were collected at necropsy (5 dpi) from two CDCD neonatal pigs in the mock-inoculated control group and two piglets in the PHEV-inoculated group. Meanwhile, the primary epithelial respiratory cells used for the development of ALI-PREC cultures were obtained from two independent control CDCD pigs, with two or three technical culture replicates used for infection or qPCR assays, respectively. Statistical analyses and plots were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0.2 (GraphPad Software Inc.). The statistical significance was determined using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multiple comparisons of Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test. For all analyses, a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Jennifer M. Groeltz-Thrush, Ginny Montgomery. and Haley Marie Lambert and other VDL-histology staff at Iowa State University for their timely processing of histology samples. We thank Tracey P. Stewart at the Roy J. Carver High-Resolution Microscopy Facility, Iowa State University, for her excellent support in TEM imaging.
Conceptualization, R.K.N., L.G.G.-L.; methodology, R.K.N., J.C.M.-D., L.G.G.-L.; software, R.K.N.; validation, R.K.N.; formal analysis, R.K.N., J.C.M.-D.; investigation, R.K.N., J.C.M.-D., L.G.G.-L.; resources, R.K.N., J.C.M.-D., L.G.G.-L.; data curation, R.K.N., J.C.M.-D., L.G.G.-L.; writing (original draft preparation), R.K.N., J.C.M.-D., L.G.G.-L.; writing—review and editing, R.K.N., J.C.M.-D., L.G.G.-L.; visualization, R.K.N.; supervision, L.G.G.-L.; project administration, L.G.G.-L.; funding acquisition, R.K.N., L.G.G.-L.
Contributor Information
Luis G. Giménez-Lirola, Email: luisggl@iastate.edu.
Matthew B. Frieman, University of Maryland School of Medicine
REFERENCES
- 1.Walker PJ, Siddell SG, Lefkowitz EJ, Mushegian AR, Dempsey DM, Dutilh BE, Harrach B, Harrison RL, Hendrickson RC, Junglen S, Knowles NJ, Kropinski AM, Krupovic M, Kuhn JH, Nibert M, Rubino L, Sabanadzovic S, Simmonds P, Varsani A, Zerbini FM, Davison AJ. 2019. Changes to virus taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2019). Arch Virol 164:2417–2429. doi: 10.1007/s00705-019-04306-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vijgen L, Keyaerts E, Lemey P, Maes P, van Reeth K, Nauwynck H, Pensaert M, van Ranst M. 2006. Evolutionary history of the closely related group 2 coronaviruses: porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus, bovine coronavirus, and human coronavirus OC43. J Virol 80:7270–7274. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02675-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pensaert MB, Callebaut PE. 1974. Characteristics of a coronavirus causing vomition and wasting in pigs. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch 44:35–50. doi: 10.1007/BF01242179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cartwright SF, Lucas M, Cavill JP, Gush AF, Blandford TB. 1969. Vomiting and wasting disease of piglets. Vet Rec 84:175–176. doi: 10.1136/vr.84.7.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Quiroga MA, Cappuccio J, Piñeyro P, Basso W, Moré G, Kienast M, Schonfeld S, Cáncer JL, Arauz S, Pintos ME, Nanni M, Machuca M, Hirano N, Perfumo CJ. 2008. Hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis coronavirus infection in pigs, Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis 14:484–486. doi: 10.3201/eid1403.070825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mora-Díaz JC, Piñeyro PE, Rauh R, Nelson W, Sankoh Z, Gregg E, Carrillo-Ávila JA, Shen H, Nelli RK, Zimmerman JJ, Giménez-Lirola LG. 2021. Porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus infection in vivo and ex vivo. J Virol 95:e02335-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02335-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Appel M, Greig AS, Corner AH. 1965. Encephalomyelitis of swine caused by a haemagglutinating virus. IV. Transmission studies. Res Vet Sci 6:482–489. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)34728-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mengeling WL, Boothe AD, Ritchie AE. 1972. Characteristics of a coronavirus (strain 67N) of pigs. Am J Vet Res 33:297–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cutlip RC, Mengeling WL. 1972. Lesions induced by hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus strain 67N in pigs. Am J Vet Res 33:2003–2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hirahara T, Yasuhara H, Kodama K, Nakai M, Sasaki N. 1987. Isolation of hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus from respiratory tract of pigs in Japan. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi 49:85–93. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.49.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lorbach JN, Wang L, Nolting JM, Benjamin MG, Killian ML, Zhang Y, Bowman AS. 2017. Porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus and respiratory disease in exhibition swine, Michigan, USA, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 23:1168–1171. doi: 10.3201/eid2307.170019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Andries K, Pensaert MB. 1980. Virus isolated and immunofluorescence in different organs of pigs infected with hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus. Am J Vet Res 41:215–218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Knowles MR, Boucher RC. 2002. Mucus clearance as a primary innate defense mechanism for mammalian airways. J Clin Invest 109:571–577. doi: 10.1172/JCI0215217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shah AS, Yehuda BS, Moninger TO, Kline JN, Welsh MJ. 2009. Motile cilia of human airway epithelia are chemosensory. Science 325:1131–1134. doi: 10.1126/science.1173869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Diamond G, Legarda D, Ryan LK. 2000. The innate immune response of the respiratory epithelium. Immunol Rev 173:27–38. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065X.2000.917304.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vareille M, Kieninger E, Edwards MR, Regamey N. 2011. The airway epithelium: soldier in the fight against respiratory viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev 24:210–229. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00014-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Takeuchi O, Akira S. 2010. Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 140:805–820. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thompson MR, Kaminski JJ, Kurt-Jones EA, Fitzgerald KA. 2011. Pattern recognition receptors and the innate immune response to viral infection. Viruses 3:920–940. doi: 10.3390/v3060920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gultom M, Licheri M, Laloli L, Wider M, Strässle M, Kratzel A, Thi Nhu Thao T, Stalder H, Portmann J, Holwerda M, Ebert N, Stokar -Regenscheit N, Zanolari P, Posthaus H, Schuller S, Vicente -Santos A, Soto M, Corrales-Aguilar E, Ruggli N, Tekes G, von V, Sawatsky B, Thiel V, Dijkman R. 2020. Susceptibility of well-differentiated airway epithelial cell cultures from domestic and wildlife animals to SARS-CoV-2. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.10.374587v1.
- 20.Bateman AC, Karasin AI, Olsen CW. 2013. Differentiated swine airway epithelial cell cultures for the investigation of influenza A virus infection and replication. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 7:139–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2012.00371.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nelli RK, Maes R, Kiupel M, Hussey GS. 2016. Use of a feline respiratory epithelial cell culture system grown at the air-liquid interface to characterize the innate immune response following feline herpesvirus 1 infection. Virus Res 214:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2016.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goris K, Uhlenbruck S, Schwegmann-Wessels C, Köhl W, Niedorf F, Stern M, Hewicker-Trautwein M, Bals R, Taylor G, Braun A, Bicker G, Kietzmann M, Herrler G. 2009. Differential sensitivity of differentiated epithelial cells to respiratory viruses reveals different viral strategies of host infection. J Virol 83:1962–1968. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01271-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Quintana AM, Landolt GA, Annis KM, Hussey GS. 2011. Immunological characterization of the equine airway epithelium and of a primary equine airway epithelial cell culture model. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 140:226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lam HC, Choi AMK, Ryter SW. 2011. Isolation of mouse respiratory epithelial cells and exposure to experimental cigarette smoke at air liquid interface. J Vis Exp (48):2513. doi: 10.3791/2513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cozens D, Sutherland E, Marchesi F, Taylor G, Berry CC, Davies RL. 2018. Temporal differentiation of bovine airway epithelial cells grown at an air-liquid interface. Sci Rep 8:14893. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33180-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.O’Boyle N, Sutherland E, Berry CC, Davies RL. 2018. Optimisation of growth conditions for ovine airway epithelial cell differentiation at an air-liquid interface. PLoS One 13:e0193998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang H, He L, Liu B, Feng Y, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Wu Y, Wang J, Gan Y, Yuan T, Wu M, Xie X, Feng Z. 2018. Establishment and comparison of air-liquid interface culture systems for primary and immortalized swine tracheal epithelial cells. BMC Cell Biol 19:10. doi: 10.1186/s12860-018-0162-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O. 2006. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124:783–801. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zielinski GC, Ross RF. 1993. Adherence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae to porcine ciliated respiratory tract cells. Am J Vet Res 54:1262–1269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baskerville A. 1970. Ultrastructural studies of the normal pulmonary tissue of the pig. Res Vet Sci 11:150–155. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(18)34353-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jeffery PK. 1983. Morphologic features of airway surface epithelial cells and glands. Am Rev Respir Dis 128(2 Pt 2):S14–S20. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1983.128.2P2.S14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sleigh MA, Blake JR, Liron N. 1988. The propulsion of mucus by cilia. Am Rev Respir Dis 137:726–741. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.3.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Satir P, Sleigh MA. 1990. The physiology of cilia and mucociliary interactions. Annu Rev Physiol 52:137–155. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.52.030190.001033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Reid LM, Jones R. 1980. Mucous membrane of respiratory epithelium. Environ Health Perspect 35:113–120. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8035113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Satir P, Christensen ST. 2007. Overview of structure and function of mammalian cilia. Annu Rev Physiol 69:377–400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.040705.141236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Button B, Cai L-H, Ehre C, Kesimer M, Hill DB, Sheehan JK, Boucher RC, Rubinstein M. 2012. A periciliary brush promotes the lung health by separating the mucus layer from airway epithelia. Science 337:937–941. doi: 10.1126/science.1223012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nelli RK, Kuchipudi SV, White GA, Perez BB, Dunham SP, Chang KC. 2010. Comparative distribution of human and avian type sialic acid influenza receptors in the pig. BMC Vet Res 6:4. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-6-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li W, Moore MJ, Vasilieva N, Sui J, Wong SK, Berne MA, Somasundaran M, Sullivan JL, Luzuriaga K, Greenough TC, Choe H, Farzan M. 2003. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 426:450–454. doi: 10.1038/nature02145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dveksler GS, Pensiero MN, Cardellichio CB, Williams RK, Jiang GS, Holmes KV, Dieffenbach CW. 1991. Cloning of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) receptor: expression in human and hamster cell lines confers susceptibility to MHV. J Virol 65:6881–6891. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.12.6881-6891.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Raj VS, Mou H, Smits SL, Dekkers DHW, Müller MA, Dijkman R, Muth D, Demmers JAA, Zaki A, Fouchier RAM, Thiel V, Drosten C, Rottier PJM, Osterhaus ADME, Bosch BJ, Haagmans BL. 2013. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 495:251–254. doi: 10.1038/nature12005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Delmas B, Gelfi J, L’Haridon R, Vogel LK, Sjöström H, Norén O, Laude H. 1992. Aminopeptidase N is a major receptor for the enteropathogenic coronavirus TGEV. Nature 357:417–420. doi: 10.1038/357417a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Peng JY, Punyadarsaniya D, Shin DL, Pavasutthipaisit S, Beineke A, Li G, Wu NH, Herrler G. 2020. The cell tropism of porcine respiratory coronavirus for airway epithelial cells is determined by the expression of porcine aminopeptidase N. Viruses 12:1211. doi: 10.3390/v12111211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shin DL, Yang W, Peng JY, Sawatsky B, von Messling V, Herrler G, Wu NH. 2020. Avian influenza A virus infects swine airway epithelial cells without prior adaptation. Viruses 12:589. doi: 10.3390/v12060589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lebedev KA, Ponyakina ID. 2006. Immunophysiology of epithelial cells and pattern-recognition receptors. Hum Physiol 32:224–234. doi: 10.1134/S0362119706020198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yan N, Chen ZJ. 2012. Intrinsic antiviral immunity. Nat Immunol 13:214–222. doi: 10.1038/ni.2229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kawasaki T, Kawai T. 2014. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front Immunol 5:461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yamamoto M, Sato S, Mori K, Hoshino K, Takeuchi O, Takeda K, Akira S. 2002. Cutting edge: a novel Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adapter that preferentially activates the IFN-β promoter in the Toll-like receptor signaling. J Immunol 169:6668–6672. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.12.6668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kawai T, Akira S. 2007. Signaling to NF-κB by Toll-like receptors. Trends Mol Med 13:460–469. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mogensen TH, Paludan SR. 2001. Molecular pathways in virus-induced cytokine production. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65:131–150. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.1.131-150.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Saito T, Gale M. 2008. Differential recognition of double-stranded RNA by RIG-I-like receptors in antiviral immunity. J Exp Med 205:1523–1527. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mordstein M, Kochs G, Dumoutier L, Renauld JC, Paludan SR, Klucher K, Staeheli P. 2008. Interferon-lambda contributes to innate immunity of mice against influenza A virus but not against hepatotropic viruses. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000151. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pott J, Mahlakõiv T, Mordstein M, Duerr CU, Michiels T, Stockinger S, Staeheli P, Hornef MW. 2011. IFN-lambda determines the intestinal epithelial antiviral host defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:7944–7949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100552108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Aaronson DS, Horvath CM. 2002. A road map for those who don’t know JAK-STAT. Science 296:1653–1655. doi: 10.1126/science.1071545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lopušná K, Režuchová I, Betáková T, Skovranová L, Tomašková J, Lukáčiková L, Kabát P. 2013. Interferons lambda, new cytokines with antiviral activity. Acta Virol 57:171–179. doi: 10.4149/av_2013_02_171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Platanias LC. 2005. Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 5:375–386. doi: 10.1038/nri1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhao L, Jha BK, Wu A, Elliott R, Ziebuhr J, Gorbalenya AE, Silverman RH, Weiss SR. 2012. Antagonism of the interferon-induced OAS-RNase L pathway by murine coronavirus ns2 protein is required for virus replication and liver pathology. Cell Host Microbe 11:607–616. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Züst R, Cervantes-Barragan L, Habjan M, Maier R, Neuman BW, Ziebuhr J, Szretter KJ, Baker SC, Barchet W, Diamond MS, Siddell SG, Ludewig B, Thiel V. 2011. Ribose 2’-O-methylation provides a molecular signature for the distinction of self and non-self mRNA dependent on the RNA sensor Mda5. Nat Immunol 12:137–143. doi: 10.1038/ni.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hur S. 2019. Double-stranded RNA sensors and modulators in innate immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 37:349–375. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Choi UY, Kang JS, Hwang YS, Kim YJ. 2015. Oligoadenylate synthase-like (OASL) proteins: dual functions and associations with diseases. Exp Mol Med 47:e144. doi: 10.1038/emm.2014.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Haller O, Frese M, Kochs G. 1998. Mx proteins: mediators of inmate resistance to RNA viruses. Rev Sci Tech 17:220–230. doi: 10.20506/rst.17.1.1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Li Z, Yang Y, Lu H, Zhang J, Xu R, Shi J, Lan Y, Guan J, Zhao K, He H, Gao F, He W. 2021. Porcine haemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus deactivates transcription factor IRF3 and limits type I interferon production. Vet Microbiol 252:108918. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sokol CL, Luster AD. 2015. The chemokine system in innate immunity. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a016303. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Delves PJ, Martin SJ, Burton DR, Roitt IM. 2011. Roitt’s essential immunology. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Li A, Dubey S, Varney ML, Dave BJ, Singh RK. 2003. IL-8 directly enhanced endothelial cell survival, proliferation, and matrix metalloproteinases production and regulated angiogenesis. J Immunol 170:3369–3376. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.6.3369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yu L, Dong J, Wang Y, Zhang P, Liu Y, Zhang L, Liang P, Wang L, Song C. 2019. Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus nsp4 induces pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine expression inhibiting viral replication in vitro. Arch Virol 164:1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s00705-019-04176-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Baggiolini M, Walz A, Kunkel SL. 1989. Neutrophil-activating peptide-1/interleukin 8, a novel cytokine that activates neutrophils. J Clin Invest 84:1045–1049. doi: 10.1172/JCI114265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kato A, Schleimer RP. 2007. Beyond inflammation: airway epithelial cells are at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 19:711–720. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Mora-Díaz JC, Temeeyasen G, Magtoto R, Rauh R, Nelson W, Carrillo-Ávila JA, Zimmerman J, Piñeyro P, Giménez-Lirola L. 2021. Infection and immune response to porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus in grower pigs. Vet Microbiol 253:108958. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hellemans J, Mortier G, De Paepe A, Speleman F, Vandesompele J. 2007. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8:R19. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Young TF, Thacker EL, Erickson BZ, Ross RF. 2000. A tissue culture system to study respiratory ciliary epithelial adherence of selected swine mycoplasmas. Vet Microbiol 71:269–279. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(99)00176-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.