Table 4.

Multivariate Logistic Regression that Evaluated Associations of Microaggressions by Race, PGY, and Sexual Orientation ^*

	OR	Lower	Upper	P
Q9A. Participants who have been a target of a microaggression in the past year
Race
Asian (versus White)	4.62	1.39	15.36	0.013
African Americans and others (versus White)	7.42	0.85	64.97	0.070
Q9C. Participants who have been a silent witness to a microaggression in last year
PGY
Integrated PGY 1–2 (vs. Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	1.66	0.45	6.04	0.443
Integrated PGY 3–4 (versus Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	6.19	1.67	22.94	0.006
Integrated PGY 5–6 (versus Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	0.83	0.31	2.22	0.705
Q11B. Participants thought material in lectures/CME/formal presentations were demeaning to their gender or sexual orientation
Sexual orientation
Nonheterosexual (versus heterosexual)	6.23	1.15	33.70	0.034
Q13E. Participants had been mistaken for a nurse, rep, PA, etc., by a patient or patient’s family
PGY
Integrated PGY 1–2 (versus Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	0.05	0.003	0.68	0.025
Integrated PGY 3–4 (versus Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	0.95	0.17	5.34	0.954
Integrated PGY 5–6 (versus Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	0.52	0.10	2.60	0.425
Q13I. Participants were treated differently by staff because of their gender or sexual orientation
Sexual orientation
Nonheterosexual (versus heterosexual)	4.32	1.12	16.68	0.034
PGY
Integrated PGY 1–2 (versus Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	0.84	0.19	3.76	0.822
Integrated PGY 3–4 (versus Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	0.23	0.06	0.84	0.026
Integrated PGY 5–6 (versus Independent PGY 1, 2, 3)	0.84	0.27	2.59	0.758

Questions 11 (options C, D, F, and G), 13 (options A, B, C, F, and H), and 14 (options A, B, C, and D) could not be analyzed due to lack of cases in one category. Remaining questions not displayed in this table were not statistically significant for race, sexual orientation, Hispanic origin, or PGY.

*Adjusted by biologic sex, race, sexual orientation, Hispanic origin, and PGY.