Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 8;92(Suppl 1):28–39. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01500-y

Table 2.

Hernia and procedure characteristics

r‑TAR/rh-TAR (n = 13)
Range
Hernia type (n [%])
Umbilical, epigastric or Spieghelian
Incisional 13 (100.0)
Previous disorder or procedure leading to hernia
Colorectal cancer 6 (46.1)
Abdominal aortic aneurysm 2 (15.4)
Recurrence of primary ventral hernia 3 (23.0)
Other, benign 3 (23.0)
Size of the hernial gap
Length in cm (mean, range [SD]) 14.9 8–24 (±4.9)
Width in cm (mean, range [SD]) 11.1 7–16 (±3.0)
Defect area in cm2 (mean, range [SD]) 132.4 88–301 (±69.6)
Defect closure (n [%]) 13 (100.0)
Size of mesh
Length in cm (mean, range [SD]) 31.7 29–45 (±4.7)
Width in cm (mean, range [SD]) 28.8 25–30 (±2.1)
Area in cm2 (mean, range [SD]) 907.5 783–1125 (±80.2)
Mesh area to hernia gap area ratio (mean, range [SD]) 8.2 3.7–15.6 (±3.2)
Type of mesh (n [%])
Versatex 13 (100.0)
Mesh fixation (n [%])
None 12 (99.3)
Vicryl suture 1 (7.6)
Drain placement (n [%]) 10 (76.9)
Hybrid version (rh-TAR) 4 (20.7)
Arista application 8 (61.5)
Skin-to-skin time in min (mean, range [SD])a 223.5 167–317 (±43.5)

Range range of variation, SD standard deviation, r‑TAR robotic transversus abdominis release, rh-TAR robotic hybrid transversus abdominis release

aTime includes docking, adhesiolysis, and redocking