Table 3.
Comparison of treatment response in patients who did and did not convert to head thrust (+) after ITG. (%)*.
| Variable | Post-ITG Head Thrust | B | P | Exp(B) 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (+) | (−) | |||||
| Treatment reaction | Yes | 93 (95.9) | 29 (78.4) | 1.851 | 0.008 | 6.363 (1.615,25.080) |
| No | 4 (4.1) | 8 (21.6) | ||||
| Drop attack control | Yes | 24 (58.5) | 8 (47.1) | −0.532 | 0.483 | 0.588 (0.133,2.598) |
| No | 17 (41.5) | 9 (52.9) | ||||
| Effect | Yes | 92 (89.3) | 43 (95.6) | −19.171 | 0.996 | — |
| No | 11 (10.7) | 2 (4.4) | ||||
*
Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust baseline data such as gender, age, laterality, duration of symptoms, and number of treatments. Treatment reaction refers to the experience of “tipsy disequilibrium” of post injection deafferentation. Effect refers to whether the symptoms of vertigo were adequately controlled.