Table 9.
Indicators of the structural model analysis.
| VIF | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INNOVATION ORIENTATION → PERFORMANCE | 1.438 | ||||
| INNOVATION ORIENTATION → SUCCESS | 1.000 | ||||
| SUCCESS → PERFORMANCE | 1.438 | ||||
| Effects on the endogenous variables | |||||
| Adjusted R 2 | Q 2 | Direct effect | Correlation | Variance explained (%) | |
| SUCCESS | 0.305 | 0.152 | 30.5 | ||
| INNOVATION ORIENTATION | 0.552 | 0.552 | 30.5 | ||
| PERFORMANCE | 0.534 | 0.285 | 53.4 | ||
| INNOVATION ORIENTATION | 0.102 | 0.472 | 4.8 | ||
| SUCCESS | 0.669 | 0.726 | 48.6 | ||
| Results of the structural model | |||||
| Path coeff. | t-value | Path Int 5.0% | Path Int 95.0% | Support | |
| H1: INNOV_OR → PERFORMANCE | 0.102ns | 1.169 | −0.054 | 0.231 | NO |
| H2: INNOV_OR → SUCCESS | 0.552*** | 5.094 | 0.370 | 0.722 | YES |
| H3: SUCCESS → PERFORMANCE | 0.669*** | 9.955 | 0.563 | 0.781 | YES |
| Effect size (f 2 ) | |||||
| INNOVATION ORIENTATION → PERFORMANCE | 0.016 | ||||
| INNOVATION ORIENTATION → SUCCESS | 0.438 | ||||
| SUCCESS → PERFORMANCE | 0.669 | ||||
| Goodness-of-fit | |||||
| Int 95.0% | Int 99.0% | ||||
| SRMR | 0.065 | 0.068 | 0.075 | ||
| d_ULS | 0.573 | 0.620 | 0.766 | ||
| d_G | 0.275 | 0.277 | 0.323 | ||
| NFI | 0.871 | ||||
***p < 0.001, based on t (9999), one-tailed test, t (0.05; 9999) = 1.645, t (0.01; 9999) = 2.327, and t (0.001; 9999) = 3.092. ns = not significant.